Gathered Work

Angelo State University.

Detection status
No AI-writing detector is named as deployed on Angelo State's own pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; Turnitin is confirmed only for plagiarism/originality checking, and Operating Policy 10.26 prohibits unauthorized student use of generative AI by default — a conduct rule, not a detection tool
Office in these sources
Office of the Dean of Students (Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities) · Houston Harte University Center, Room 112 · 325-942-2047 · deanofstudents@angelo.edu
Ombuds or advocacy office
None located on the institution's own pages in this review.
Sources last checked
Oct 1, 2026

Reproduced from the institution's own pages quoted below — potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case.

Angelo State's published sources on AI detection and academic integrity, quoted and linked below. These are potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case — course syllabi and department rules may also apply, and Angelo State's own policy leaves generative-AI permission to the instructor's syllabus. Confirm applicability with the institution. Any dates are quoted from the sources, not a deadline calculation performed for you.

01Detection status

No AI-writing detector is documented as deployed at Angelo State

Angelo State's own tool-selection page for faculty describes Turnitin only as a plagiarism/originality tool (page undated; retrieved Oct 1, 2026):

"Reveal content matches in student writing"

Source: TurnItIn — Digital Learning and Instruction, Angelo State University. No AI-writing or generative-AI detection feature is named on that page.

The university's own AI Task Force recommendations, dated Nov. 8, 2024, list among "Proactive Strategies that Require University Funding and/or Support": "Explore different AI detection tools in addition to Turnitin to address academic integrity issues and concerns." This is a committee recommendation to look into more tools, not a statement that Turnitin or any other detector is currently deployed for AI-writing detection; it is quoted here rather than read either way. Source: AI Task Force Recommendations 11/08/2024 — pages.uwf.edu.

Student-facing guidance instead states the underlying conduct rule: Angelo State's library guide on AI and plagiarism (last updated Aug 20, 2026; retrieved Oct 1, 2026) states the university "currently prohibits the use of AI tools by students to complete academic coursework unless the instructor provides required documentation in the course syllabus," citing Operating Policy 10.26, "Use of Generative AI Tools by Students." Source: AI — Plagiarism, Angelo State University Library. This is a rule governing permitted use, not a detection tool, and no page in this sweep names a specific AI-writing detector as enabled. No other named vendor (SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) returned a first-party result on angelo.edu in this sweep.

02Published procedure

What Angelo State's own pages say about how cases proceed

Who may be present
"Yes, you can. An attorney is considered an 'advisor' and can attend any meeting or hearing," subject to advance notice: "If you decide to bring an attorney, the Office of the Dean of Students requires a written request at least five days in advance of the scheduled hearing date." Not stated: whether recording the meeting or hearing is permitted. — Student Conduct FAQ (retrieved Oct 1, 2026) · Student Conduct FAQ
What follows on the record
Not stated for transcript notation specifically. On retention and disclosure: "Disciplinary records are maintained in Room 112 of the Houston Harte University Center. Both electronic and paper records are retained for a minimum of seven (7) years," and "[t]he student's educational record may be shared with colleges or universities where the student seeks or intends to enroll." — Discipline Records (retrieved Oct 1, 2026) · Discipline Records

The two questions an adviser raises first, answered from this institution's own published documents — or recorded as not stated in them.

From the Code of Student Conduct procedures Angelo State publishes for students (pages undated; retrieved Oct 1, 2026):

"A student, faculty member or staff member may file a complaint by completing the Incident Reporting form." "If a preponderance of evidence exists, Conduct Officers can find the student responsible and assign sanctions even if the student chooses not to participate in the process." "[S]anctions may be imposed and can include, but are not limited to: reprimand, probation, deferred suspension, suspension, expulsion, conditions, restrictions, academic penalties, and parental notification." "A petition for appeal must be submitted to the designated Appeal Officer within five university business days of the delivery of the written decision made by the Hearing Officer or Panel."

Sources: Student Conduct FAQ (filing) and Rights and Responsibilities (standard, sanctions, appeal). On disclosure beyond the institution: "[t]he Office of the Dean of Students is often the point of contact for behavior- or conduct-related background checks. Inquiries for past conduct and behavioral information can be provided to federal, state and local entities via their investigation process" — source: Discipline Records. No page in this sweep states a disclosure rule specific to graduate programs, employers, or licensing boards, or a transcript-notation rule distinct from the discipline-records retention stated above. What these quotations mean for any particular case is for the institution and its process to determine; they are reproduced so you can read the originals in context.

03Source map

Where the documents live

DocumentLocation
Turnitin (plagiarism/originality checking)angelo.edu — TurnItIn
AI Task Force Recommendations (Nov. 8, 2024)pages.uwf.edu — AI Task Force Recommendations 11/08/2024
AI and generative-AI policy guidance (Operating Policy 10.26)angelo.libguides.com — AI (Plagiarism guide) (last updated Aug 20, 2026)
Student Conduct FAQ (filing, advisor/attorney, notice)angelo.edu — Student Conduct FAQ
Rights and Responsibilities (standard, sanctions, appeal)angelo.edu — Rights and Responsibilities
Discipline Records (retention, disclosure)angelo.edu — Discipline Records
Office of the Dean of Students (contact)angelo.edu — Contact the Office of the Dean of Students

Organizing your own drafts and records to bring to any of this: the records checklist. Capturing the pages above as they read today, and keeping your own dated record beside them: what to do with these sources.

04Change log

Revision history of this page

2026-10-01 — Page created (scheduled run; cold build, no prior CANDIDATES.md/procedure-facts.json research to reuse). Slug "angelostate" chosen because "asu" is already Arizona State University's slug in this collection. Named-vendor sweep (Turnitin, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) and category sweep (the Digital Learning and Instruction tool-selection page, the university Library's AI/plagiarism guide, the AI Task Force recommendations, the Student Conduct FAQ and Rights and Responsibilities pages) found Turnitin confirmed for plagiarism/originality checking only; no AI-text detector confirmed as deployed. The AI Task Force's Nov. 8, 2024 recommendation to "[e]xplore different AI detection tools in addition to Turnitin" was read as ambiguous on current deployment and quoted as a recommendation rather than treated as a deployment statement in either direction. NOT DISQUALIFIED: no detector was ever documented as in use for AI-writing detection, so neither step-2 branch is met — an empty inventory, not a deactivation. Operating Policy 10.26 ("Use of Generative AI Tools by Students") is a conduct rule (unauthorized generative-AI use is prohibited by default, permitted only where a syllabus says so) rather than a detection tool; its full PolicyStat text was not captured because the library guide's own paraphrase and quotation of its effect were sufficient for this page's purpose and PolicyStat pages are not reliably reachable by this pass's unattended transport. PROCESS: filing, evidentiary standard, sanctions range and appeal window are Angelo State's own Student Conduct FAQ and Rights and Responsibilities pages; neither page nor the Discipline Records page states a recording rule for meetings/hearings or a transcript-notation rule distinct from the stated seven-year records-retention period — both recorded as scope limits rather than inferred. OMBUDS/ADVOCACY CHECKED AND NOT FOUND: no office titled ombudsperson, ombudsman, or student advocate was located on angelo.edu; the Office of the Dean of Students and Student Disability Services were read and neither claims independence, confidentiality, or a scope covering academic-misconduct allegations generally — docket states "None located." OFFICE: Office of the Dean of Students (Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities), Houston Harte University Center, Room 112, 325-942-2047, deanofstudents@angelo.edu — captured from the office's own contact page. Nothing paraphrase-pending. Deliberate omission: OP 10.26's full PolicyStat text, noted above rather than quoted. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter (review confirmed 2026-10-01). Internet Archive captures: to be added.

Spot an error or an outdated quotation? hello@gatheredwork.com — corrections are made on the record, in this log.