The institutions.
One page per institution: its published academic-integrity sources on AI detection — quoted, dated, linked to the originals, and kept under a visible change log. Each page presents potentially relevant official sources; none determines which policy governs a case, calculates a deadline, or recommends an argument. The collection began with a five-institution pilot and grows as new pages clear review. What the pages say read across — how many name a detector, how many name none, how many publish a caution — is the collection; what their sources changed, month by month, is the change record.
01
Pages
| Institution | Detection status, per its own pages | Last checked |
|---|---|---|
| University at Buffalo | Turnitin AI detection available on UB Learns assignments, enterprise-wide | Oct 5, 2026 |
| University of North Carolina Wilmington | Turnitin AI Detection available in Canvas, instructor-enabled; not recommended as the only documentation for an Honor Code referral | Oct 17, 2026 |
| West Chester University | Turnitin AI Writing Detection tool enabled in D2L; faculty urged to use it with caution | Oct 18, 2026 |
| California State University San Marcos | No AI-text detector documented as deployed; Turnitin used for similarity/plagiarism checking only; faculty are barred from using any unapproved AI-detection software, and no approved one is named | Oct 18, 2026 |
| Florida Gulf Coast University | Turnitin's AI Writing Detection is available in Canvas; instructors are told to use it only to start a conversation, never as the sole basis for a finding | Oct 18, 2026 |
| University of Colorado Denver | Turnitin confirmed for originality/plagiarism checking only; a Student Conduct page names Pangram as an example of "various generative AI detection tools" faculty can ask about, without stating whether it is licensed or deployed campus-wide | Oct 18, 2026 |
| Liberty University | Turnitin on nearly all Canvas assignments; faculty AI guidance governs detector use | Sep 24, 2026 |
| Western Governors University | Background AI detection in the similarity checker; overt-evidence standard; evaluator review | Aug 30, 2026 |
| Adelphi University | Turnitin via Moodle; Turnitin-only rule for GenAI reports; score alone not sufficient evidence | Oct 4, 2026 |
| UC Davis | Turnitin similarity in Canvas; no campus-wide AI-indicator statement located; course-level AI rules | Aug 30, 2026 |
| UC San Diego | Turnitin similarity in Canvas; AI-writing detection disabled in the Extended Studies Turnitin instance (Spring 2025); no main-campus AI-indicator statement located; AIO cautions against treating AI detectors as accurate | Oct 15, 2026 |
| University of North Georgia | Turnitin similarity review per the Supplemental Syllabus; no campus-wide AI-indicator statement located; AI rules set per professor | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Arizona State University | Turnitin in Canvas per provost faculty resources; no campus-wide AI-indicator statement located; instructor-level AI rules | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Texas A&M University | University advises against sole reliance on AI detectors; Turnitin reports listed as violation-report documentation; per-instructor GenAI rules under Student Rule 20 | Aug 31, 2026 |
| University of Central Florida | Turnitin similarity per faculty-center pages; unauthorized AI use framed as plagiarism and named in the Student Code of Conduct; no campus-wide AI-indicator statement located | Sep 25, 2026 |
| The Ohio State University | Turnitin Feedback Studio confirmed enterprise-wide; no campus-wide AI-indicator statement located; COAM requires instructor permission for GenAI use | Sep 24, 2026 |
| Florida International University | Turnitin AI Indicator trainings run by the Division of IT (most recently Jan 2026); no campus-wide statement located on evidentiary use of scores | Sep 25, 2026 |
| University of South Florida | Turnitin described by USF as its plagiarism-detection system, similarity reports; university genAI guidance states AI detection is "not reliably possible with technology"; no AI-indicator statement located; instructor-level AI rules | Sep 3, 2026 |
| University of Cincinnati | Turnitin embedded in Canvas; central AI guidance says instructors "should not over rely" on detectors; Student Code of Conduct names "unauthorized use of artificial intelligence" as cheating; no AI-indicator statement located | Sep 2, 2026 |
| University of Houston | Institutional Turnitin license in Canvas, described by UH as including an AI-detection tool; no campus-wide statement on its evidentiary use located; Academic Honesty Policy names no AI category | Sep 3, 2026 |
| University of North Texas | Turnitin AI detection reports in Canvas, documented by DSI CLEAR and listed by the Office of Academic Integrity; UNT Libraries states a detection report alone "is not sufficient evidence" for a violation | Sep 4, 2026 |
| Utah Valley University | Copyleaks plagiarism and AI content detection in Canvas per OTL guides; Faculty Senate noted AI false positives (Apr 2025); no statement located on evidentiary use of scores | Sep 25, 2026 |
| California State University, Fullerton | Turnitin similarity in Canvas; no AI-writing report documented in CSUF's Canvas guides; Faculty Development Center warns detector use can result in false accusations | Sep 2, 2026 |
| University of Georgia | Turnitin AI Writing Detector confirmed first-party as CTL's sole approved detector for eLC assignments; CTL states scores are not "a definitive measure of misconduct"; no statement located on evidentiary use of scores | Sep 2, 2026 |
| Georgia State University | Turnitin Originality Checker (iCollege-wide license) includes AI detection; CETLOE states "Detector results alone should never be treated as proof of misconduct"; using results in discipline requires AI Committee consultation | Sep 4, 2026 |
| California State University, Long Beach | Turnitin AI writing detection confirmed first-party in Canvas via ATS/DoIT; guidance cautions it "should not be used as a definitive judgment of plagiarism"; no statement located on its evidentiary use in OSCED proceedings | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Texas Tech University | Turnitin's SimCheck AI score available in Canvas; TLPDC and the Office of Student Conduct advise "extreme caution," stating a detector report is not sole evidence but may support an incident report | Sep 25, 2026 |
| California State University, Northridge | Turnitin AI detection confirmed first-party via IT-hosted faculty training and the Provost/OSCED guidance memo; OSCED states an AI-detection score alone is not sufficient evidence for disciplinary action | Oct 18, 2026 |
| North Carolina State University | Turnitin's AI Detection report re-enabled and documented first-party in Moodle (DELTA/IT, Fall 2025); Office of Student Conduct will not accept referrals based solely on the Similarity Score Index | Oct 18, 2026 |
| University of Arkansas | Turnitin AI Writing Detection available to all instructors, with the integrity office publishing its own thresholds and corroborating factors before a report is filed; Honorlock documented for fully online exams, with Respondus LockDown Browser with Monitor recommended by the same office for other classes | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Louisiana State University | Turnitin AI writing detection listed among LSU's licensed Turnitin products and confirmed by the conduct office; iThenticate adds AI writing detection on the research side; Faculty Senate–endorsed guidelines state faculty "must not rely on outputs from such tools alone to report or penalize students" | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Texas State University | Turnitin plagiarism and AI writing detection reports available to faculty; the Honor Code Council states the score "cannot be the sole evidence of academic misconduct when submitting an Honor Code violation" and lists the corroborating observations it expects instead; the Council states it "receives information from TopHat," and names Proctorio and ProctorU as proctoring options without their deployment being captured here | Sep 22, 2026 |
| San José State University | Turnitin similarity and AI Writing Detection documented in Canvas, with a Turnitin Clarity pilot for Spring 2026; university policy S26-10 permits only university-approved detection services and states academic sanctions "may not be imposed based solely on the results of the university-approved AI-detection software" | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Temple University | Turnitin AI Detector licensed university-wide but enabled only on faculty request after training; the teaching centre states detectors are "not a viable solution" and the tool "often inaccurate"; Proctorio also documented for online exams | Sep 22, 2026 |
| The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley | Turnitin AI writing detection documented in Brightspace, with UTRGV's IT knowledge base stating its analysis "should not be used as the sole determinant of academic misconduct"; Respondus LockDown Browser and Monitor proctoring also integrated | Aug 28, 2026 |
| The University of Texas at Dallas | Turnitin held under a university subscription and usable inside eLearning; UT Dallas describes it centrally as a plagiarism detection service, and its AI-writing detection is named only in a 2024 Center for Teaching and Learning teaching-tip post, not in central policy. MOSS software-similarity checking is documented for engineering areas and Respondus Monitor for remote exam proctoring | Aug 28, 2026 |
| Florida Atlantic University | Turnitin AI writing detection announced for Canvas assignments in 2023 and trained on in 2024; FAU's current Turnitin page names only similarity checking; Honorlock proctoring on a departmental license | Aug 28, 2026 |
| Weber State University | Copyleaks plagiarism and AI content detection among WSU Online's approved Canvas tools; CETL states some detection software “may unfairly penalize students or be ineffective at detecting AI use”; Honorlock proctoring documents no general AI blocking; no institution-level Turnitin documentation located | Aug 28, 2026 |
| Clemson University | Turnitin AI-generated content detection in Canvas assignments and Respondus Monitor AI-powered checking, both documented by Clemson Online; iThenticate similarity review of every graduate thesis and dissertation manuscript; Undergraduate Learning's October 2025 guidance states that AI detector results alone are not sufficient to support an academic integrity charge | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Northern Arizona University | Turnitin Originality named by the Office of the Provost as “NAU's industry-leading licensed solution,” in the same sentence that says detector results “cannot be considered as definitive evidence of an academic integrity violation”; Verity documented as an AI-enabled proctoring service; Cline Library's guide adds that a detector's evaluation is “insufficient evidence” on its own; no NAU page names a Turnitin AI writing indicator as a separate feature | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Utah State University | Copyleaks, not Turnitin — USU states it has used Copyleaks “in place of Turnitin” since July 20, 2023; Copyleaks' AI Detection feature “is enabled by default” in Canvas SpeedGrader, sits outside the similarity score, and USU's own guidance tells instructors to treat it “as a data point and a conversation starter rather than proof the student cheated”; Proctorio documented for exam proctoring with no AI-writing-detection claim | Aug 28, 2026 |
| Kent State University | Turnitin available to all faculty and students through Canvas and described by Kent State as able to “identify potential plagiarism, AI-assisted writing, and inconsistencies from what would be found in a typical paper,” with the university's own caution that “A high score does not automatically indicate that the student plagiarized”; University Libraries runs a separate Turnitin draft-checking service on request; Respondus Monitor documented as the current proctoring technology; a provost page naming Proctorio and dating its own figures to Spring 2020 was live through Aug 28, 2026 and has since moved or been withdrawn; no statement on the evidentiary use of an AI score located | Sep 25, 2026 |
| California State University, Fresno | Turnitin AI Writing Detection documented as a Chancellor's Office–funded pilot enabled in summer 2025 and “enabled by default for all courses using Turnitin,” with results visible to instructors only and Fresno State's own instruction to treat a report as “a starting point, not a conclusion”; Turnitin originality checking documented separately in Canvas Assignments; Respondus LockDown Browser and Monitor in the proctoring stack; the pilot's end is not stated on any page located | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Old Dominion University | Turnitin integrated with Canvas, with ODU's own academic-technology page stating “the AI checker is not reliable!” and that it “often provides false positives”; the 2025-26 Academic Integrity Procedures state the AI Checker percentage alone does not determine a violation but “will be considered with all other evidence”; Respondus and SmarterProctoring documented in the proctoring stack; third-party detectors listed to faculty as tools to be familiar with, not as ODU deployments | Sep 29, 2026 |
| University of Memphis | Turnitin AI writing detection available through the Canvas integration, campus-wide | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Middle Tennessee State University | Turnitin documented institutionally for plagiarism checks only, and named as required documentation on a plagiarism referral; no MTSU page documents an AI-writing detector in institutional use, and the one MTSU page directing faculty to AI detectors is a college IT services list of free third-party tools that itself states “we cannot rely on them as faculty” | Oct 3, 2026 |
| Kennesaw State University | Turnitin listed as available including its AI features and enabled in D2L Brightspace; iThenticate for research papers; Respondus Monitor proctoring | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Auburn University | Turnitin (Canvas, enterprise) and iThenticate (research writing) licensed; AI-detection use not stated in Auburn's own pages | Aug 29, 2026 |
| Virginia Commonwealth University | Turnitin documented for similarity only — no VCU page names an AI-writing indicator; Respondus Monitor webcam video analytics licensed to all faculty, staff and students; the CTLE states the accuracy of GenAI-detection tools “is not guaranteed” and bars uploading student work to one absent a VCU contract | Aug 29, 2026 |
| East Carolina University | Turnitin runs in Canvas, but ECU's own Turnitin service page and FAQ describe similarity checking and the ETS e-rater grammar tool only and name no AI-writing indicator; ECU's AI site asks faculty to weigh "mistrust and surveillance" before using AI detection technologies while leaving the choice to them; Respondus LockDown Browser and Respondus Monitor are deployed for exam proctoring and are not described by ECU as AI detection | Aug 29, 2026 |
| Ohio University | Turnitin selected centrally as the university's plagiarism detection technology through 2030 and built into Canvas, described by the university's own pages as a similarity checker; no institutional statement enabling Turnitin's AI-writing detection was located, and the teaching centre's published position statement calls AI detection "a flawed technology"; Proctorio is the OIT-supported online proctoring tool as of July 1, 2026, with Respondus LockDown Browser also available | Aug 29, 2026 |
| Georgia Southern University | Turnitin runs inside Folio at instructor discretion, documented by the university as OriginalityCheck similarity only — no Georgia Southern page located in this review names a Turnitin AI writing indicator; iThenticate is scoped to faculty researchers and graduate thesis and dissertation committees, with student accounts unavailable; Respondus LockDown Browser and Respondus Monitor are available through Folio; the university's 2025 AI policy leaves the use of "language detection tools, proctoring tools, process analytic tools" to each course's own syllabus statement | Aug 29, 2026 |
| University of Maryland, College Park | Turnitin originality checking in ELMS-Canvas; no AI detector documented as deployed, and Academic Affairs advises against detectors while contemplating referrals | Aug 29, 2026 |
| Georgia Institute of Technology | Turnitin AI writing detection in Canvas and Honorlock proctoring that flags AI browser plugins, both documented first-party by OIT; no statement located on what weight a detector result carries | Aug 29, 2026 |
| Iowa State University | Turnitin (Originality, DraftCoach, Gradescope) listed first-party as a CELT-vetted Canvas tool and iThenticate licensed for theses, dissertations and grant proposals only; no ISU page located in this review states whether Turnitin's AI writing indicator is enabled, and the Office of Student Conduct tells faculty not to rely on AI-detection tools alone | Sep 25, 2026 |
| University of Kansas | Turnitin AI writing detection documented in Canvas by the Center for Teaching Excellence (used with caution, not disabled); iThenticate licensed separately through KU single sign-on; KU states it has no specific policy on generative AI in teaching and learning | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Stony Brook University | Turnitin's AI detection is documented as available and instructor-enabled per assignment in Brightspace, with the teaching centre stating that detection tools are not recommended as the sole means of determining academic dishonesty; Respondus LockDown Browser and Respondus Monitor are documented for exam proctoring | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Missouri State University | Turnitin is documented as plagiarism detection instructors can enable per assignment in Brightspace, and Respondus LockDown Browser and Monitor for exam proctoring; no Missouri State page located in this review states that Turnitin's AI writing indicator is enabled, disabled or in use, and the university's own faculty AI guidance names no detection tool at all | Aug 31, 2026 |
| West Virginia University | Turnitin Originality Checking is documented as a vendor-supported tool inside eCampus, and Respondus LockDown Browser alongside it under an information-technology standard for online proctored exams; no WVU page located in this review states that Turnitin's AI writing indicator is enabled, disabled or in use, and neither the academic-integrity policy nor the Campus Student Code names any detection tool or score | Sep 1, 2026 |
| University of Delaware | No campus-wide AI-text detector documented; UD cautions educators against AI detectors; iThenticate in the graduate thesis pipeline | Oct 3, 2026 |
| University of Nebraska–Lincoln | Turnitin similarity in Canvas; CTT FAQ states UNL has no supported AI checker and does not recommend detectors; Respondus Monitor AI-flag proctoring documented | Sep 25, 2026 |
| University of Mississippi | SafeAssign text-matching documented in Blackboard, and Respondus LockDown Browser and Monitor with ProctorU documented by the UM Testing Center; no AI-writing detector documented as deployed, and the units that address detection caution against it — the Libraries state they do not recommend any AI detection tool | Sep 25, 2026 |
| University of Louisville | No institutional AI-detection contract — the Delphi Center states UofL “does not hold an institutional contract with any AI detection provider,” that instructors who use such tools “do so as individuals,” and that outputs “should never serve as the sole basis for an academic integrity decision”; SafeAssign plagiarism checking and Respondus LockDown Browser and Monitor proctoring documented in Blackboard; no Turnitin documentation located on UofL's pages | Sep 26, 2026 |
| Mississippi State University | Turnitin Similarity is documented as the university's academic-integrity product in Canvas, and Honorlock AI-monitored proctoring is contracted for online exams; no central Mississippi State page located in this review states whether Turnitin's AI writing detection is enabled, while Electrical and Computer Engineering syllabi state that all submitted work is filtered through Turnitin's AI writing detection tool | Sep 25, 2026 |
| San Francisco State University | Turnitin's AI-detection score discontinued campus-wide June 1, 2024 (a CSU contract change); no AI-writing detector is currently provided, but the Office of Student Conduct's own guidance still names "an Academic Integrity report from TurnItIn or other source" as acceptable evidence of AI-generated work | Sep 27, 2026 |
| University of Alabama at Birmingham | Turnitin AI Check available in Canvas assignments, instructor-enabled per assignment; iThenticate, which also detects AI-generated text, available separately through the Office of Research | Oct 6, 2026 |
| Sam Houston State University | Turnitin (Feedback Studio) confirmed via Blackboard for plagiarism/similarity checking; an AI-writing indicator was documented by SHSU in 2023, not confirmed on any live SHSU page in this review | Sep 27, 2026 |
| University of Nevada, Reno | Turnitin similarity checking via WebCampus (Canvas) and on graduate thesis/dissertation manuscripts; Respondus LockDown Browser and Monitor for exam proctoring, not AI-text detection; no first-party UNR page located in this review names an AI-writing-detection tool or confirms Turnitin's AI indicator | Oct 5, 2026 |
| Ball State University | SimCheck (Turnitin) plagiarism detection confirmed deployed via Canvas since at least 2021 and still referenced in current course syllabi; no first-party BSU page located in this review confirms or denies Turnitin's AI-writing-indicator feature; Respondus LockDown Browser and Monitor confirmed for exam proctoring, not AI-text detection | Sep 26, 2026 |
| Grand Canyon University | No AI-detection software relied on for findings, per GCU's own statement; LopesWrite (in-house tool, successor to Turnitin) required for similarity/citation checking; generative-AI misuse addressed through faculty verification | Oct 6, 2026 |
| Walden University | Turnitin required for coursework, confirmed first-party on Walden's Tech Support page (the Code of Conduct itself only says "antiplagiarism application… of Walden's choosing"); no first-party statement of an enabled AI-writing indicator; Generative-AI misuse addressed through faculty verification and required interaction documentation, not a detection score | Sep 25, 2026 |
| University of Phoenix | SafeAssign (Blackboard's built-in similarity/plagiarism checker) required for all coursework, per the University's own Academic Policies & Procedures document; separately, the current Online Academic Catalog's Student Code of Conduct authorizes Conduct Resolutions to use unnamed "reliable means of AI detection," scoring submissions for likelihood of AI-generated content, when a generative-AI misconduct report is referred for formal discipline; no named AI-writing-detection vendor (Turnitin, Copyleaks, etc.) found on any UOPX page in this review | Oct 6, 2026 |
| University of Maryland Global Campus | Turnitin required for similarity checking on coursework, confirmed first-party; Academic Integrity Policy separately authorizes unnamed “software tools and other technologies” and lists text-similarity reports as case evidence; no first-party page names an AI-writing-detection feature specifically | Oct 6, 2026 |
| Strayer University | Turnitin offered through Canvas Draft Review as a self-check students "may choose" to run before submitting for grading — confirmed first-party, though the current library FAQ page is login-gated and is quoted here from an Internet Archive capture; the Academic Integrity Policy separately reserves the University's right to review any submitted work, but no page states that Turnitin or any tool automatically screens every submission; the Honor Code and Policy both make violating a separate "Ethical Standards & Appropriate Use of AI for Students" guidelines document its own violation, but that document sits behind Strayer's iCampus student-login portal and could not be read | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Kansas State University | No AI-text detector confirmed deployed — the Canvas third-party apps list, the Teaching and Learning Center's AI-resources page, IT's resources, and the Graduate School's ETDR pipeline all come back empty; Honorlock is licensed for exam proctoring only, not AI-text detection; the Honor and Integrity System's plagiarism definition was revised in 2026 to name genAI/computer-generated work explicitly | Oct 6, 2026 |
| Towson University | SafeAssign (Blackboard's built-in plagiarism-matching tool) confirmed deployed; no AI-text detector confirmed anywhere on towson.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep | Sep 25, 2026 |
| California State University, San Bernardino | Turnitin deployed via Canvas for plagiarism-similarity checking only — no CSUSB page names its AI-writing module; Respondus LockDown Browser and Monitor deployed for exam proctoring, its Monitor feature using AI to flag exam behavior, not written text; no AI-text detector (GPTZero, Copyleaks, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Examity, iThenticate) confirmed anywhere on csusb.edu | Oct 8, 2026 |
| Bowling Green State University | Turnitin AI Writing Indicator available via Canvas (ITS's own AI Resources page); Respondus LockDown Browser blocks device access during exams to keep students off AI tools, not a text detector; BGSU's own University Libraries guide cautions that AI writing detectors are generally unreliable; no other AI-text detector confirmed on bgsu.edu | Oct 8, 2026 |
| University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa | No AI-text detector confirmed deployed for Mānoa's own courses — Turnitin Similarity and Turnitin Clarity are embedded in Lamakū, the UH System's shared LMS, per UH West Oʻahu's library page announcing its own subscription, but no Mānoa page confirms Mānoa activated either; Honorlock (system-wide, Fall 2026) is AI-driven exam-behavior proctoring, not a text detector; Mānoa's own AI guidance to faculty names no detection tool at all | Oct 8, 2026 |
| University of North Carolina at Greensboro | Turnitin confirmed deployed via Canvas for text-similarity checking; the College of Arts & Sciences separately states Turnitin's AI detection, built into Feedback Studio, produced results that were "all over the place" in testing; no UNCG page confirms whether the AI writing indicator specifically is enabled; Respondus LockDown Browser and Monitor documented for exam proctoring, not text detection | Sep 25, 2026 |
| American Public University System | Copyleaks confirmed as APUS's current detection tool, integrated into the classroom Assignments tool and described by the University Library as helping students "avoid plagiarism and excessive AI use in your assignments" (migration from Turnitin completed by the University's own account, library pages updated Sep 2, 2026); a 2023 faculty blog post on APU's own site describes Turnitin's since-superseded AI-writing feature, reproduced here as historical rather than current; no automated AI exam-proctoring vendor documented — students arrange their own human proctor when a course requires one | Oct 11, 2026 |
| Capella University | Turnitin required campus-wide, including on dissertations, under a university contract with iParadigms, for plagiarism/similarity checking; no Capella page confirms or denies whether Turnitin's AI-writing indicator specifically is enabled. Separately, Capella's Library offers students Pangram, a named AI-text-detection tool, as a self-check resource; a "Capella AI Skills Portal" is referenced as carrying the university's AI-use statement but sits behind a learner login and was not captured | Oct 11, 2026 |
| Chamberlain University | Turnitin or other anti-plagiarism software is confirmed for textual-similarity review of "all required papers, discussions or other written learning activities," per the College of Nursing Student Handbook; no Chamberlain page confirms an AI-writing-indicator feature specifically. Separately, a proxy-testing investigation may draw on "proctoring software," "behavioral analysis of video review," and technical markers (IP address, geolocation, device logs) — evidentiary methods named without a specific vendor. The University Library's AI Literacy guide discusses AI-related academic-integrity risk generally and names no detection tool | Oct 11, 2026 |
| National University | Turnitin similarity checking in use across coursework (Brightspace and NCUOne) and the doctoral Doctoral Record; NU's Generative AI guidelines state that the Office of Student Conduct considers third-party AI-detection software and usage reports “insufficient to prove plagiarism”; no statement enabling or disabling Turnitin's AI writing indicator located | Oct 13, 2026 |
| Colorado Technical University | Turnitin Originality Verification (similarity) runs automatically on Virtual Campus submissions and in Draft Coach, per the University Catalog and CTU's Writing Support Center; CTU's Provost statement on generative AI says CTU is ‘not sanctioning the use of third-party tools for use or detection’; no Turnitin AI-writing indicator is documented as enabled or disabled | Oct 13, 2026 |
| Keiser University | Turnitin and SafeAssign named as the plagiarism-detection software run in courses (Writing Studio and library guidance); SafeAssign in Blackboard per a program handbook; no AI-writing-detection tool or proctoring vendor located; the catalog states it is the student's responsibility to provide proof of originality | Oct 13, 2026 |
| Full Sail University | No AI-detection or similarity-checking tool named on Full Sail's public pages in this review; the Student Manual (06.26) leaves generative-AI use to instructor discretion and treats unattributed AI-generated content as Academic Dishonesty; Turnitin use is asserted only in the vendor's own case study, not on a Full Sail page | Oct 13, 2026 |
| University of the Cumberlands | SafeAssign (Blackboard similarity report) documented for all students in iLearn and in instructor tutorials; no AI-writing detector named on Cumberlands' own pages in this review; Respondus LockDown Browser being removed from general use per IT guidance (Dec 2025); AI misuse handled as academic dishonesty under the catalog policy | Oct 18, 2026 |
| Excelsior University | Turnitin and Authorship named as designated originality/authenticity services, used in course instruction and as investigation evidence; a required antiplagiarism self-check tool runs on major writing assignments; no AI-writing-indicator statement located | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Thomas Edison State University | Copyleaks confirmed first-party as the plagiarism/AI detection tool integrated into courses on most written assignments; unauthorized AI use is its own named violation and is separately treated as plagiarism under the Code of Conduct | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Franklin University | Turnitin's AI-writing detection report confirmed first-party, visible only to the instructor; the Academic Misconduct policy separately authorizes "University-approved plagiarism and AI detection tools" without naming one; unauthorized AI use is its own defined form of plagiarism | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Columbia Southern University | SafeAssign Originality Checker confirmed available for text-similarity checking inside Blackboard; no CSU page located in this review names, confirms, or denies an AI-writing-detection tool, and neither the Academic Integrity Policy nor the AI Acceptable Use Policy names any detection technology | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Bellevue University | Turnitin confirmed deployed for plagiarism/text-similarity checking, including Turnitin Draft Coach for students; no Bellevue page located in this review confirms or denies that Turnitin's separate AI-writing-detection feature is enabled for assignments, and the Student Code of Conduct names no detection tool at all | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Post University | No AI-writing detector, or any text-plagiarism-detection tool, is named anywhere in the Academic Integrity Policy or the Generative AI Use Policy; suspected violations are reviewed by University personnel rather than software, and the only confirmed exam-integrity technology is an unnamed, generic online proctoring service plus ProctorU, named specifically for the American Sentinel College of Nursing & Health Sciences | Oct 15, 2026 |
| City University of Seattle | An unnamed plagiarism-detection tool confirmed deployed through the learning management system (Academic Integrity Policy #2300.10); no AI-text detector confirmed by name anywhere on cityu.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep — a 2013 MBA-program newsletter and a login-gated my.cityu.edu/turnitin/ portal address are the only sources naming Turnitin, both too stale or too narrow to confirm what tool operates campus-wide today | Oct 15, 2026 |
| DePaul University | Turnitin's AI Detector via Originality Check in D2L, confirmed active; turned off for all DePaul Turnitin accounts Sep 28, 2023, turned back on Jan 2024; students cannot see the report; framed as a conversation-starter, not a strict enforcement tool | Oct 15, 2026 |
| UC Riverside | Turnitin is documented as a plagiarism/similarity checker integrated with Canvas; no UCR page located in this review names or confirms Turnitin's separate AI-writing-detection feature, or any other AI-text detector, as enabled | Oct 17, 2026 |
| UC Santa Cruz | No AI-text or plagiarism detector confirmed by name anywhere on ucsc.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep; the campus's own generative-AI FAQ states student work should not be submitted to external, web-based detection tools such as GPTZero without institutional hosting, a Purchasing contract, or student consent, citing FERPA — a data-handling restriction on ad hoc instructor use, not a statement that any detector is deployed, endorsed, or disabled | Oct 17, 2026 |
| Hunter College | Turnitin is confirmed integrated into Brightspace at Hunter for similarity/plagiarism checking; CUNY's own systemwide guidance states the CUNY-licensed version of Turnitin "does not have AI detection tools that detect AI-generated content" — no AI-text detector is named anywhere on hunter.cuny.edu or in CUNY's own systemwide documentation across a named-vendor and category sweep | Oct 17, 2026 |
| The University of New Mexico | Turnitin AI writing detection integrated with UNM Canvas; UNM's own instructor guidance cautions that detection tools can generate false positives; no evidentiary-weight statement located from the Dean of Students Office | Oct 17, 2026 |
| Miami University | Turnitin confirmed as Miami's only Canvas plagiarism/similarity tool; no page confirms or denies Turnitin's separate AI-writing indicator; Academic Affairs states Miami "does not recommend relying on AI detection tools to determine whether work was produced with AI" | Oct 17, 2026 |
| Metropolitan State University of Denver | Turnitin used for plagiarism/similarity checking; MSU Denver's own teaching-center guide states "Turnitin is not an AI detection tool"; Academic Affairs guidance says AI detection tools "are not reliable enough to serve as evidence on their own" | Oct 17, 2026 |
| Baruch College | Turnitin is confirmed deployed at Baruch through Blackboard for similarity/plagiarism checking; CUNY's own systemwide guidance states the CUNY-licensed version of Turnitin "does not have AI detection tools that detect AI-generated content" — no AI-text detector is named anywhere on baruch.cuny.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep | Oct 17, 2026 |
| Montana State University | Turnitin's AI detection feature is confirmed deployed at MSU: the Center for Faculty Excellence states "Montana State University currently employs the Turnitin AI detection tool," shown as a percentage within the similarity report, and recommends faculty treat a flagged report "as a flag for potential academic misconduct, instead of sole evidence, for further investigation" — no other AI-text detector is named anywhere on montana.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep | Oct 17, 2026 |
| Queens College | Turnitin confirmed for plagiarism/similarity checking; CUNY's own systemwide guidance states the CUNY-licensed Turnitin "does not have AI detection tools that detect AI-generated content"; QC's teaching center (CETLL) discourages AI-detection-tool use as unreliable — no AI-text detector confirmed deployed at Queens College | Oct 18, 2026 |
| New York City College of Technology | Turnitin and SafeAssign confirmed for plagiarism-matching only; City Tech's AI Task Force guidelines state "Do not trust AI detection software"; the Academic Integrity Policy FAQ cautions that third-party AI detectors such as GPTZero "have not been vetted by colleges and universities" — no institutional AI-text detector confirmed deployed | Oct 18, 2026 |
| Tarleton State University | Turnitin documented in use alongside Respondus as a Canvas-supported instructional tool; no institutional statement confirming Turnitin's AI-writing indicator specifically was located | Oct 18, 2026 |
| University of Louisiana at Lafayette | Turnitin's AI writing detection confirmed available to faculty through Moodle; the Office of Distance Learning separately cautions that "relying on AI detection services is not advisable" and that "AI detection software has proven to be unreliable" | Sep 19, 2026 |
| Southern Utah University | CopyLeaks confirmed deployed as a similarity checker, with SUU's own guidance stating "tools such as CopyLeaks do not detect plagiarism but instead identify similarities"; no AI-text detector is documented as deployed | Sep 19, 2026 |
| Minnesota State University, Mankato | No AI-text detector confirmed deployed; Turnitin is documented at Mankato as an anti-plagiarism tool only, and the Minnesota State system office cautions against using AI detection tools as a singular indicator of plagiarism | Sep 21, 2026 |
| University of Houston-Downtown | No AI-text detector confirmed deployed; Turnitin is documented at UHD as a plagiarism checker only, and UHD's own teaching center cautions that software claiming to detect AI-generated text "is prone to false positives and false negatives" | Sep 21, 2026 |
| California State University, Dominguez Hills | Turnitin AI writing detection confirmed deployed campus-wide in Canvas since Aug 25, 2025, visible to instructors only and not, in Turnitin's own words reproduced by CSUDH, "the sole basis for action or a definitive grading measure" | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Eastern Kentucky University | No AI-text detector confirmed deployed; EKU's own AI Guidance page lists only general-purpose, university-contracted AI tools (Microsoft 365 Copilot, Google Gemini), and the current Academic Integrity regulation names no detection tool anywhere in its text | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Southeastern Louisiana University | No AI-text detector confirmed deployed; Southeastern's Academic Integrity Policy and the Provost's current semester memo both delegate AI-use rules to the course syllabus, and no Southeastern page names an AI-writing detector | Sep 22, 2026 |
| University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh | Turnitin confirmed deployed campus-wide in Canvas ("Plagiarism checker and other tools"); UWO's own teaching-center guidance names Turnitin's detector directly and states a detector's results "should NOT be used as evidence of academic dishonesty" | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Utah Tech University | Copyleaks confirmed deployed in Canvas as the university's plagiarism and generative-AI detector, replacing Turnitin; its AI Content Detection component is instructor-enabled per assignment and "not enabled by default" | Sep 22, 2026 |
| The City College of New York | Turnitin confirmed deployed at CCNY, funded as "Plagiarism detection software" in the FY2026 Student Technology Fee budget; CUNY's own systemwide guidance states the CUNY-licensed version of Turnitin "does not have AI detection tools that detect AI-generated content" — no AI-text detector is named anywhere on ccny.cuny.edu or in CUNY's own systemwide documentation | Sep 22, 2026 |
| North Carolina A&T State University | SafeAssign is confirmed integrated into Canvas at NC A&T for originality/plagiarism checking; no AI-text detector is named anywhere on ncat.edu or support.ncat.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep | Sep 23, 2026 |
| University at Albany | No AI-text detector confirmed deployed; a named-vendor and category sweep of the Brightspace Instructor FAQ, IT tools catalog, library guides, and teaching-center guidance found none named, and the teaching-and-learning guidance cautions broadly against relying on "AI detection software" without confirming or denying institutional use | Sep 23, 2026 |
| University of Vermont | Turnitin confirmed integrated with Brightspace for similarity/plagiarism checking only (IT knowledge base article, updated Mar 19, 2026); no AI-text detector is named anywhere on uvm.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep | Sep 23, 2026 |
| New Mexico State University | Turnitin licensed campus-wide for originality (plagiarism) checking, with Draft Coach available to students; no first-party NMSU source states whether Turnitin's AI-writing detection component is enabled | Sep 24, 2026 |
| Georgia Gwinnett College | Turnitin AI Checker confirmed deployed as an AI-detection tool, visible to instructors, with GGC's own guidance cautioning it "can result in false positives"; Turnitin Similarity is a separate plagiarism-checking feature | Sep 24, 2026 |
| University of Nebraska Omaha | Turnitin confirmed for plagiarism/similarity checking connected to Canvas; UNO's Faculty Guiding Principles caution that "AI detection tools" are unreliable and biased and should be "a starting point for discussion, not as conclusive evidence" — without naming which tool provides that capability at UNO | Sep 24, 2026 |
| John Jay College of Criminal Justice | Turnitin and SafeAssign confirmed as plagiarism-software tools faculty may attach to a report; CUNY's own systemwide guidance states the CUNY-licensed version of Turnitin "does not have AI detection tools that detect AI-generated content" — no AI-text detector is named anywhere on jjay.cuny.edu or in CUNY's own systemwide documentation | Sep 24, 2026 |
| The University of Akron | No AI-text detector, or any specific plagiarism-detection tool, is named on the University of Akron's own academic-integrity, student-conduct, or library pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; a library guide curates third-party AI-detector links for law-school instructors to explore on their own, which is not presented as an institutional deployment | Sep 24, 2026 |
| University of New Hampshire | Turnitin's AI writing indicator, added atop SimCheck plagiarism detection in myCourses (Canvas), available to all UNH and CPS faculty | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Northern Illinois University | No AI-text detector is named as deployed on NIU's own academic-integrity, student-conduct, library, or teaching-center pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; SafeAssign is confirmed in Blackboard for plagiarism/similarity checking only, and NIU's own teaching center discourages relying on AI detectors generally | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Brooklyn College | Turnitin confirmed for plagiarism/similarity checking in Brightspace; CUNY's own systemwide Brightspace faculty guidance states Turnitin "does not feature AI detection tools for identifying AI-generated content" — no AI-text detector is named anywhere on brooklyn.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Kean University | "AI detection tools integrated into Canvas" are named in the Board-approved Academic Integrity Policy itself as one form of evidence faculty may use; the policy does not name a specific vendor, and Turnitin is separately confirmed as the plagiarism-checking tool available through Canvas | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Lehman College | Turnitin confirmed for plagiarism/similarity checking (the Center for Teaching and Learning's own Turnitin page is undated and still describes Blackboard, though Lehman moved all courses to Brightspace in summer 2025); Lehman's own Academic Integrity FAQ states "CUNY OAA has not activated" Turnitin's Generative AI detection feature for CUNY, citing false positives — no AI-text detector confirmed as deployed across a named-vendor and category sweep | Sep 26, 2026 |
| College of Charleston | Turnitin confirmed for plagiarism/similarity checking in OAKS; no AI-writing-specific Turnitin feature or any other AI-text detector is named anywhere on charleston.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep — the Honor Code itself prohibits unauthorized use of generative AI tools, which is a conduct rule, not a detection tool | Sep 26, 2026 |
| East Tennessee State University | Turnitin's AI-writing score, described by ETSU's own IT Services as able to "detect writing that may have been generated by AI tools like ChatGPT," available for faculty to enable in D2L; ETSU's own teaching-support pages caution that the feature "is currently in the early stages of development and may be unreliable" and tell instructors not to use it as "'gotcha' evidence" | Sep 26, 2026 |
| Cal State East Bay | Turnitin's AI detection tool confirmed available to faculty in Canvas "as of 3/19/25," per the university's own online-tools help site; the campus Policy on Academic Dishonesty separately encourages instructors to "utilize plagiarism detection software such as Turnitin" for similarity checking | Sep 26, 2026 |
| Troy University | Turnitin integrated with Canvas for assignment submission, per Troy's own IT Helpdesk; no first-party Troy page names an AI-writing-detection feature, and the named-vendor sweep found none | Sep 27, 2026 |
| University of Central Oklahoma | Turnitin confirmed for similarity/plagiarism checking; the Code of Student Conduct lists "[t]he unauthorized use of artificial intelligence sites, such as ChatGPT, Google Translate, etc." as an academic-dishonesty violation — a conduct rule, not a detection tool — and no AI-text detector is named anywhere on uco.edu | Sep 27, 2026 |
| Idaho State University | Turnitin's AI indicator confirmed by the Academic Integrity Council's own page as "a significant aid" alongside other evidence, with a stated caveat that it "provides a probable estimate rather than absolute proof"; the Council also has access to a separate Turnitin "forensics linguistics tool" for high-stakes cases | Sep 27, 2026 |
| Louisiana Tech University | Turnitin confirmed for similarity checking only ("compared to a database of Web pages, newspapers, journals, books, and other students' papers"); no AI-writing-detection feature or any other AI-text detector is named anywhere on latech.edu, and the Academic Honor Code itself does not mention generative AI | Sep 27, 2026 |
| Coastal Carolina University | Turnitin confirmed for plagiarism/similarity checking via Moodle; no AI-writing-specific Turnitin feature or any other AI-text detector is named anywhere on coastal.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep — the Code of Student Conduct treats generative AI as a conduct rule, not a detection tool | Sep 28, 2026 |
| Texas Woman's University | No AI-writing detector, or any specific plagiarism-detection tool, is named on TWU's own Academic Integrity Policy, Student Code of Conduct, or IT help-desk pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; Turnitin is confirmed only as an optional similarity-checking tool instructors may choose to use | Sep 28, 2026 |
| University of North Dakota | No AI-text detector, or any specific plagiarism-detection tool, is named as deployed on UND's own academic-integrity, student-life, or library pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; the Provost's own AI page instead cautions that "websites that purport to detect the use of AI are flawed and have high occurrences of false positives and negatives" | Sep 28, 2026 |
| Fort Hays State University | No AI-writing detector, or any plagiarism-detection tool, is named on FHSU's AI resource hubs, the University Libraries' Generative AI research guide, or the Academic Honesty Policy across a named-vendor and category sweep | Sep 28, 2026 |
| South Dakota State University | Turnitin confirmed for similarity/plagiarism checking, listed under an "Originality Checker" heading; no AI-writing-specific feature or any other AI-text detector is named anywhere on sdstate.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep, and neither of the University's two core conduct policies mentions generative AI at all | Sep 28, 2026 |
| University of Alaska Anchorage | No AI-text detector documented for coursework; one college's scholarship application states unnamed AI detection tools will check disclosed AI use in essay responses | Sep 29, 2026 |
| Central Michigan University | No AI-writing detector, or any specific plagiarism-detection tool naming AI, is named on CMU's own AI, teaching-center, or library pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; Blackboard's SafeAssign is confirmed only as an instructor-optional similarity/plagiarism checker | Sep 29, 2026 |
| University of Southern Mississippi | AI-detection software confirmed available to instructors; no vendor named. Turnitin confirmed separately for plagiarism/originality checking, including on graduate theses and dissertations | Sep 29, 2026 |
| Western Carolina University | No AI-writing detector, or any dedicated AI-use policy, is named on WCU's own IT, library, or academic-integrity pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; Turnitin is confirmed only as a plagiarism-detection tool instructors may require | Sep 29, 2026 |
| Southern New Hampshire University | Turnitin similarity used by faculty, per Shapiro Library; no AI-indicator statement located; GenAI guidelines in the Student Handbook | Sep 29, 2026 |
| University of Tennessee at Chattanooga | Faculty guidance names Copyleaks and GPTZero as the free AI-text detectors "most reliable at this time"; Turnitin is confirmed only for similarity/plagiarism checking, not AI-writing detection | Sep 30, 2026 |
| Commonwealth University of Pennsylvania | No AI-text detector is named on Commonwealth University's own policy, helpdesk, or teaching pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; Turnitin is confirmed only for similarity/plagiarism checking, and the Academic Integrity Policy names unauthorized AI use as dishonesty without naming a detection tool | Sep 30, 2026 |
| Northern Kentucky University | No AI-text detector is named on NKU's own policy, teaching-center, or helpdesk pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; Turnitin is confirmed only for originality/plagiarism checking, and the AI Usage Guidelines govern syllabus policy without naming a detection tool | Sep 30, 2026 |
| University of Wisconsin-Green Bay | Turnitin's AI writing detection score is available to instructors on Canvas assignments, campus-wide; the teaching center cautions it is "not a confidence score" and states a detector result "cannot be, by itself, used to charge a student with an academic integrity violation" | Sep 30, 2026 |
| University of Wisconsin-Whitewater | Turnitin's AI-writing detection is enabled campus-wide as an indicator within the Similarity Report; the teaching center states AI detection "should never be the sole evidence" in a misconduct case and that scores under 20% "should not be interpreted as evidence of AI-generated writing" | Sep 30, 2026 |
| College of Staten Island | Turnitin confirmed for plagiarism/similarity checking in Brightspace; CUNY OAA has not activated Turnitin's Generative AI detection feature system-wide (per Lehman College's own Academic Integrity FAQ, citing false positives) — no AI-text detector confirmed as deployed on CSI's own pages across a named-vendor and category sweep | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Angelo State University | No AI-writing detector is named as deployed on Angelo State's own pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; Turnitin is confirmed only for plagiarism/originality checking, and Operating Policy 10.26 prohibits unauthorized student use of generative AI by default — a conduct rule, not a detection tool | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Stephen F. Austin State University | SFA's own Center for Teaching and Learning names Turnitin's AI-detection tools, GPTZero and Copyleaks among tools that "exist to detect the use of generative AI," with Turnitin "integrated into Brightspace's Dropbox tool"; the same page cautions that accuracy "varies considerably" and use "could result in false positives" | Oct 1, 2026 |
| New Jersey Institute of Technology | Turnitin available via Canvas; its AI-writing detection confirmed in use in First-Year Writing (ENGL 101/102) with published point-deduction thresholds; no institution-wide AI-indicator statement located | Oct 2, 2026 |
| Farmingdale State College | No AI-text detector confirmed deployed; Turnitin documented for plagiarism/similarity checking only; no AI-writing-detection feature or other AI-text detector is named anywhere on farmingdale.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep | Oct 2, 2026 |
| Cleveland State University | CSU's own "Academic Integrity Resources" page names Turnitin, Winston AI and AI Detector Pro under an "AI/Plagiarism Detection Tools" heading, as a bare list with no statement of which are licensed, deployed, or enabled; Turnitin's own CSU resource page describes similarity/plagiarism checking only | Oct 2, 2026 |
| University of Colorado Colorado Springs | No institutional page confirms Turnitin's AI-writing detector at UCCS; the Faculty Resource Center's Turnitin page describes plagiarism checking and iThenticate only; a UCCS student newspaper article describes Turnitin's AI detection in use, but is student journalism, not an institutional source, and is not used here as confirmation | Oct 2, 2026 |
| University of Wisconsin-La Crosse | Turnitin's AI detection score confirmed enabled and visible to instructors and administrators only, per UWL's own knowledge-base article; UWS 14 (Wisconsin Administrative Code) governs the hearing process, standard of proof, advisor right, recording, appeal and records identically across the Universities of Wisconsin, as at every other UW System campus in this collection | Oct 2, 2026 |
| University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire | Turnitin's AI detection score, enabled since end of Fall 2023, visible to instructors only (not to students); Learning and Technology Services and the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning instruct faculty to "use the results with caution" and not as sole evidence, with a 90%+ confidence threshold before pursuing a misconduct case | Oct 3, 2026 |
| University of Idaho | Turnitin confirmed integrated into Canvas for plagiarism/similarity checking; a knowledge-base article titled How to enable Plagiarism & AI Detection with "Turnitin" links to Turnitin's own AI-writing-detection FAQ, but its own instructions describe only the Similarity-report workflow — read as named, not confirmed enabled; the same article quotes UI's Chief Data & AI Officer cautioning that detection tools are "controversial" and that non-native-English writing "gets flagged more often" | Oct 3, 2026 |
| University of Maine | Turnitin confirmed under contract for plagiarism/similarity checking in Brightspace; UMaine's own Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning states first-party that Turnitin "claims to have the technology to detect AI-generated text" but "Assessments of Turnitin's results don't support this claim," adding "We are not aware of any vendor who has succeeded" — read as skepticism about effectiveness, not a statement that any detector has been disabled or is off-limits to instructors | Oct 3, 2026 |
| Southern Illinois University Edwardsville | No AI-writing detector is named as deployed on SIUE's own IT, faculty-development, or policy pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; Turnitin and iThenticate are confirmed only for plagiarism/similarity checking, and the University's own suggested syllabus statement prohibits unauthorized generative-AI use as an academic-policy violation without naming any detection tool | Oct 3, 2026 |
| Ferris State University | No AI-text detector of any kind — Turnitin, SafeAssign, or otherwise — is named as deployed anywhere on Ferris State's own IT, academic-affairs, or student-conduct pages across a named-vendor and category sweep | Oct 3, 2026 |
| University of South Alabama | No AI-writing detector is named on South Alabama's own pages — Turnitin is documented only for originality/plagiarism similarity checking, and the University's Generative AI usage policies name no detection tool for identifying violations | Oct 4, 2026 |
| Arkansas Tech University | No campus-wide AI-text detector is named on ATU's own pages — Turnitin runs through Blackboard without any AI-writing feature named; the Nursing Department alone documents screening assignments "for AI usage," without naming a tool | Oct 4, 2026 |
| Arkansas State University | Two AI-text detectors confirmed deployed and instructor-accessible: Turnitin's AI writing report inside Canvas, and K16 Solutions' Scaffold AI-Detection (powered by GPTZero), integrated as an LTI tool across assignments, quizzes and discussion boards | Oct 4, 2026 |
| Colorado Mesa University | No AI-text detector is named as deployed on CMU's own pages — Turnitin Feedback Studio is documented only for plagiarism prevention in D2L, with an outbound link to Turnitin's own AI-writing marketing page rather than a first-party deployment statement | Oct 4, 2026 |
| California State University, Stanislaus | Turnitin's AI Detector confirmed deployed for all instructors via Canvas, campus-wide; Stan State's own guidance states a flagged report "should be considered only a first screening and not proof, by itself, of misconduct" | Oct 5, 2026 |
| Dallas College | No AI-text detector is named as deployed on Dallas College's own pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; the Board of Trustees' Student Code of Conduct prohibits unauthorized AI use as "cheating" without naming a detection tool | Oct 5, 2026 |
| Austin Peay State University | Turnitin's AI writing detection confirmed deployed, integrated into D2L Assignments; APSU's own guidance states the AI indicator "should not be used as the sole basis for action or a definitive grading measure by instructors" | Oct 5, 2026 |
| Prairie View A&M University | No AI-writing detector is confirmed deployed institution-wide; the Center for Instructional Innovation and Technology Services' own Turnitin pages describe only plagiarism Similarity Reports, and the only AI-detection claim located is one instructor's own course syllabus, not a general IT statement | Oct 5, 2026 |
| Youngstown State University | No AI-text detector documented as deployed; Blackboard SafeAssign (text-similarity) is available to instructors and iThenticate is limited to graduate thesis/dissertation review | Oct 6, 2026 |
| St. Cloud State University | SCSU's own IT knowledge base states there are currently no approved AI-detection or plagiarism-detection services available to the campus, and that faculty may not use unapproved software to check for either | Oct 6, 2026 |
| University of West Georgia | Turnitin confirmed deployed in CourseDen for similarity/plagiarism checking; UWG's own faculty guidance separately cautions against solely relying on "generative AI detectors, such as Turnitin's tool," without confirming that its AI-writing module is campus-enabled | Oct 6, 2026 |
| Jacksonville State University | Turnitin and HonorLock named as evidence sources in Scholars' Code cases; JSU's own IT support page describes Turnitin only as a plagiarism-detection tool integrated into Canvas, naming no AI-writing detection feature | Oct 7, 2026 |
| California State University, Bakersfield | No AI-text detector is named as deployed anywhere in CSUB's own Academic Integrity Policy; "Using Artificial Intelligence" to complete graded work without authorization is named as a violation category, with no detection mechanism stated | Oct 7, 2026 |
| Pennsylvania Western University | No AI-text detector is named anywhere in Policy AC059 (Academic Integrity) or in the Student Code of Conduct; AC059 does not mention AI or generative tools at all, naming only cheating, plagiarism, fabrication and related categories | Oct 7, 2026 |
| Central Washington University | No AI-text detector is named as deployed anywhere in CWU's own pages; Turnitin is documented by the campus's own quick-start guide only for "plagiarism detection," and WAC 106-125's definition of academic dishonesty names no detection tool | Oct 7, 2026 |
| Morgan State University | No AI-writing detector is named for coursework; Turnitin is documented only for plagiarism and grammar checking, and the School of Graduate Studies separately uses Copyleaks to screen theses, dissertations and doctoral capstones for plagiarism and improper paraphrasing | Oct 8, 2026 |
| University of Wyoming | No AI-text or plagiarism detector is named as deployed anywhere on UW's own pages; the teaching center's own knowledge base states "We don't have an institutional license" for Turnitin or another plagiarism detector and discourages their use | Oct 8, 2026 |
| Marshall University | No AI-text detector is named anywhere on Marshall's own pages; SafeAssign, the plagiarism-prevention tool on Blackboard assignments, is described only as checking originality against an institutional repository and the internet, not AI generation | Oct 8, 2026 |
| Southern Illinois University Carbondale | Copyleaks is deployed in D2L Brightspace with AI-content detection on by default, replacing a prior Turnitin deployment; CTE's own FAQ separately describes Respondus Monitor's webcam exam proctoring as "AI Cheating Detection" | Oct 8, 2026 |
| Bridgewater State University | No AI-writing detector is named as deployed; SafeAssign checks plagiarism/originality in Blackboard Ultra, and the IT knowledge base's own faculty guidance states "AI detection tools are not currently reliable," directing instructors to engage students directly instead | Oct 8, 2026 |
| Southeast Missouri State University | No AI-writing detector is named as deployed anywhere in SEMO's own pages; the IT Knowledge Base's Canvas and Third Party Tools catalogs list no Turnitin, Copyleaks, or similar product at all, only Respondus LockDown Browser, an exam-lockdown tool with no AI-writing-detection claim | Oct 9, 2026 |
| Morehead State University | No AI-text detector is named as deployed anywhere in MSU's own pages; its AI Task Force, Library AI guide, and Canvas FAQs are entirely about using AI, not detecting it, and the Canvas FAQ's full question list names only Respondus LockDown Browser/Monitor, an exam-proctoring tool | Oct 9, 2026 |
| Fashion Institute of Technology | No AI-text detector is named anywhere on fitnyc.edu, including Turnitin; a teaching-center page calls AI detection tools "notoriously unreliable and inconsistent" and recommends alternatives | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi | Turnitin deployed in Canvas for plagiarism/similarity checking; a teaching-center page tells instructors to "Explore Turnitin's AI detection features (beta)"; no campus-wide statement on the evidentiary weight of a score was located | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Stockton University | No AI-text detector is deployed; Turnitin was discontinued after June 30, 2024, and Blackboard SafeAssign is confirmed for plagiarism checking only; a teaching-center page describes ZeroGPT/GPTZero as third-party web tools "not available in Blackboard," cautioning about high false-positive and false-negative rates | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Florida A&M University | Turnitin's AI detector is confirmed available ("the one in TurnItIn"); the Generative AI Coursework Use Policy's Faculty FAQ states results "should never be the sole basis for an academic integrity decision" | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Empire State University | Turnitin is documented only for similarity/plagiarism checking in Brightspace assignments, plus a separate faculty-only "Plagiarism Comparison Tool"; no Empire State page located in this review states that an AI-writing detector is enabled, disabled, or in use | Oct 11, 2026 |
| University of Northern Iowa | No reachable UNI page states whether an AI-writing detector is enabled or disabled; UNI's "AI in Teaching & Learning" guidance discusses AI detectors generally as unreliable ("undercut in practice by false positives"), and the IT help site's own Turnitin page is gated behind a CatID login | Oct 11, 2026 |
| Middle Georgia State University | A similarity-report tool is confirmed as supporting documentation in academic-conduct cases; no MGA page names an AI-writing detector or states one is enabled, disabled, or in use | Oct 11, 2026 |
| University of North Alabama | No UNA page confirms or denies that an AI-writing detector is deployed; UNA's Generative AI Policy cautions faculty to "[a]void using AI-detection software as the single means of verifying originality," and the one UNA page describing Turnitin returned a server error on a direct, dated fetch this pass | Oct 11, 2026 |
| Indiana University of Pennsylvania | Turnitin's AI-writing check is available on Brightspace (D2L) assignments; IT Support's own page calls the tools' accuracy "controversial" | Oct 12, 2026 |
| University of Southern Indiana | No AI-writing detector is deployed; the Teaching and Learning Center's own page states SafeAssign (Blackboard) "does not have a tool to determine if work submitted has been generated by an AI-generation tool" | Oct 12, 2026 |
| University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point | Turnitin's AI detection feature is offered, but the teaching center's own guidance calls it "not reliable" and says it "can't be used as a definitive AI detector or as sole evidence of misconduct" | Oct 12, 2026 |
| Rutgers University–Newark | Turnitin is deployed campus-wide for originality checking under an enterprise license; no page confirms or denies whether Turnitin's AI-writing indicator specifically is enabled, and the university's own library guide cautions against relying on AI-detection tools | Oct 12, 2026 |
| The University of Texas at Tyler | Turnitin is confirmed deployed with "AI writing detection capabilities," per the Office of Digital Learning's own faculty page; no UT Tyler page located states a reliability caution or a non-sole-evidence rule for it | Oct 12, 2026 |
| Eastern Washington University | Copyleaks, described as "a plagiarism and AI detection tool," is offered through Canvas for every instructor; Turnitin is used separately for plagiarism/similarity checking only. EWU's Provost-issued Academic Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI state the university does "not recommend that instructors rely upon AI detection tools" | Oct 13, 2026 |
| Valdosta State University | No AI-text detector is named as deployed on any VSU page located; Turnitin is used for similarity/plagiarism checking only. VSU's AI Acceptable Use Policy tells instructors to "[n]otify students in the syllabus if using AI detection software," implying any use is a per-instructor choice rather than a campus-wide deployment | Oct 13, 2026 |
| Nevada State University | No AI-text detector is named anywhere in Nevada State's Student Code of Conduct (SA 5.2) or its central AI-resources page; "Inappropriate AI Use" and "Cheating – AI" are defined only as syllabus-policy violations, with no detection method specified | Oct 13, 2026 |
| University of Central Missouri | No AI-text detector is named anywhere in the sources reviewed, including the Academic Honesty Policy (revised October 25, 2024 specifically "to incorporate language addressing AI use") and the library's own AI-and-plagiarism guide; "Unauthorized use of artificially generated content" is defined only as a syllabus-compliance violation, with no detection method specified | Oct 13, 2026 |
| University of South Dakota | USD's faculty AI guidance names Turnitin and Respondus Monitor as software that provides "scores" based on matching student submissions or monitoring student behavior, and states the university does not recommend "relying solely on detection tools, which are unreliable and raise privacy concerns"; results "should be verified and human reviewed before decisions about academic misconduct are made" | Oct 13, 2026 |
| The College of New Jersey | No AI-text detector is named as deployed, disabled, or recommended against on any TCNJ page located in this review; the Academic Integrity Policy and its companion documents name no detection tool | Oct 14, 2026 |
| Wright State University | Turnitin's AI-writing detector is funded and available to instructors campus-wide in Pilot (Brightspace) Feedback Studio, under a contract renewed Nov 1, 2024; a Feb 2025 Faculty Senate committee report records 1,087 faculty/staff/graduate-assistant users between Nov 2024 and Feb 2025. The Academic Integrity Policy itself bases an AI-use finding on "the instructor's subject matter expertise and discretion," not a detector score | Oct 14, 2026 |
| Texas A&M International University | Turnitin is TAMIU's supported plagiarism/AI-detection tool; the university's own Instructional Technology Turnitin page curates a dedicated "AI Writing" section linking instructor guides for AI Writing Detection in both the classic and new Similarity Report views. No TAMIU page states what weight an AI-writing result carries in the Honor Council process | Oct 14, 2026 |
| William & Mary | No AI-text detector is named as deployed, disabled, or recommended against on any William & Mary page located in this review; the Honor Code and SARP's own AI advice for faculty name no detection tool | Oct 14, 2026 |
| Southwest Minnesota State University | No AI-text detector is named as deployed, disabled, or recommended against on any SMSU page located in this review, including a zero-result search of SMSU's own IT knowledge base for "turnitin" and "AI detection"; Policy A-032 instead requires faculty to support an AI-misconduct accusation with "multiple pieces of evidence" | Oct 14, 2026 |
| University of Alabama in Huntsville | No AI-writing detector is named on UAH's own pages — Turnitin is documented through the Enhanced Teaching and Learning Center's Canvas integration with no AI-writing feature named, and the University's 2023 AI classroom guidance names no detection tool for identifying violations | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Eastern Illinois University | Turnitin's AI writing detection indicator is confirmed enabled by EIU ("EIU has enabled this function in Turnitin"); the same guidance states the final determination of misconduct rests with the instructor, not the score | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania | No AI-text detector is named as deployed, disabled, or recommended against on any SRU page located in this review; the Academic Integrity Policy and the library's own AI guide name no detection tool, placing the burden on the student instead | Oct 15, 2026 |
| West Texas A&M University | Turnitin's AI score is confirmed in use: WTAMU's own IT guide, last revised 7/15/25, documents viewing an "AI Score" on submissions; instructors can see it, students cannot, and Turnitin's own disclaimer that it "should not be used as the sole basis for adverse actions against a student" is quoted on the same page | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Southern Connecticut State University | No AI-text detector is confirmed adopted by SCSU; the library's own guide curates Turnitin's AI Writing Detector among six third-party options with no statement that SCSU licenses it, and names only SafeAssign, a similarity checker, as "available to SCSU users" | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Tennessee State University | No AI-text detector documented. Turnitin is confirmed in use at TSU's eLearn LMS only as GradeMark, described by Academic Affairs as a tool for marking a student's paper in the eLearn Dropbox — not a similarity-checking or AI-writing-detection feature; no tnstate.edu source documents either. Respondus LockDown Browser/Monitor is listed for exam support, an identity/behavior-monitoring tool, with no AI-text-detection claim. | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Texas A&M University-San Antonio | No AI-text detector documented. Turnitin is confirmed in use through Blackboard only as a similarity/plagiarism checker ("It is used as a way to detect possible plagiarism"); no tamusa.edu page claims an AI-writing-detection feature. The Student Handbook instead treats unauthorized AI use as a form of unauthorized assistance under its Cheating definition, not as something a detector flags. | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Indiana State University | No AI-text detector is named as deployed, disabled, or recommended against on any indianastate.edu or indstate.edu page located in this review. The Code of Student Conduct's Academic Integrity Misconduct definitions name no detector; one computer-science department's own (draft, unapproved as of Aug 6, 2025) course policies tell instructors to hold exams in person and "consider quick follow-ups" instead, which is a department-level process practice, not an institutional detector. | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Texas Southern University | No AI-text detector is named as deployed, disabled, or recommended against on any tsu.edu page located in this review. The Student Code of Conduct's Academic Misconduct definition and its Academic Dishonesty provisions name no detector and do not mention artificial intelligence or generative AI at all. | Oct 16, 2026 |
| University of Northern Colorado | No AI-text detector is named as deployed, disabled, or recommended against on any unco.edu page located in this review, including UNC's own 2025 AI Task Force report. The Student Code of Conduct lists "Unauthorized use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)" as a form of academic misconduct defined by lack of instructor permission, not by a detector's score. | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Northern Michigan University | Turnitin's AI Writing comparison is one of three comparisons (Similarity, Flags, AI Writing) in NMU's Similarity Report, run through EduCat (Moodle) on Assignments, Discussion Forums, Quizzes, and Workshops. The Center for Teaching and Learning's own guide states students cannot see this comparison and that Turnitin "is not perfect and will not catch every source." | Oct 17, 2026 |
| Southern University and A&M College | No AI-text detector is named as deployed on any subr.edu or sus.edu page located in this review; Turnitin is confirmed only for plagiarism/similarity checking in Moodle. The Southern University System's Comprehensive Artificial Intelligence Use Policy states that a detection tool's result "should be the start of data gathering and not the end decision making tool," directing a conversation with the student once further evidence — including comparison with past writing — is gathered. | Oct 17, 2026 |
| Colorado State University Global | CSU Global's Appeals Center states "[i]nstructors receive a TurnItIn report that focuses on identifying possible AI content," which triggers human review before any action. A separate, more recently updated Student Help Center page instead names "CopyLeaks" for the same similarity-report function and does not mention AI — an unreconciled divergence between two CSU Global-published sources. | Oct 17, 2026 |
| University of Louisiana Monroe | No AI-text detector is named as deployed, disabled, or recommended against on any ulm.edu page located in this review, including the 2025-26 Code of Student Conduct and the 2023-24 Student Handbook. The Code's Cheating and Plagiarism provision defines the offense and its escalating penalties without naming a detection tool of any kind. | Oct 17, 2026 |
| William Paterson University | Turnitin, integrated with Blackboard, is confirmed first-party for plagiarism/originality checking; no page located names an AI-writing detection feature. WPU's separate Generative AI in Coursework policy leaves AI-use rules to each instructor's syllabus and directs faculty to the Center for Teaching and Learning with Technology for handling suspected AI misuse, without naming a detection tool. | Oct 17, 2026 |
| SUNY New Paltz | Turnitin's AI writing detector is deployed campus-wide, integrated with Brightspace ("Turnitin is the campus supported tool"). OIT's own guidance states "no AI detection tool is perfectly accurate," that "faculty must not assume that a positive result from an AI tool means a student used AI," and that "False positives can happen"; OIT directs faculty uncertain of a result to ask whether the student can verbally convey the same ideas, show the sources they consulted, or produce drafts. | Oct 18, 2026 |
| Kutztown University | Turnitin is deployed at Kutztown, enabled per instructor on a per-assignment basis in D2L; KU's own new-student IT guide states Turnitin "scans for AI-generated text," confirming an active AI-detection capability. No KU page located states the evidentiary weight of an AI-detection result, and a bounded sweep found no published process-based verification method. | Oct 18, 2026 |
| Salisbury University | No AI-text detector is documented. Salisbury "contracts with Turnitin for plagiarism detection and deterrence," confirmed only for textual-similarity/plagiarism review; no page swept — the Turnitin statement, the dedicated Turnitin support page, and the syllabus GenAI-statement guidance — names an AI-writing detection feature. | Oct 18, 2026 |
| University of Wisconsin-Platteville | No AI-text detector is documented. UW-Platteville's own help-desk knowledge base describes Turnitin only as a similarity-checking tool, confirmed first-party ("you use the Turnitin website to obtain a similarity report"); no page swept names an AI-writing detection feature. | Oct 18, 2026 |
| University of Tennessee at Martin | No specific AI-text detector is named anywhere swept. UT Martin's campus Policy on Artificial Intelligence (Version 1, effective July 1, 2025) authorizes the category generically: "UT Martin Faculty/Staff may use AI detection tools for instructional and assignment purposes," but "[u]nder no circumstances shall the results of AI detection tools be the single measure for determining the academic performance of or misconduct by a Student." | Oct 18, 2026 |
| Saginaw Valley State University | Turnitin's AI detection report is the only AI-text detector SVSU directs faculty to use; the Office of Student Conduct Programs' FAQ for Faculty states a score is "No, not solely" sufficient and "should not be used as standalone evidence," directing faculty instead toward drafts, revision history, or a student interview. | Oct 19, 2026 |
| University of Houston-Clear Lake | Turnitin evaluates Canvas submissions for indicators of AI use through its Enhanced Originality Report; OIT's own student guide confirms the AI results go only to instructors, not to students, and no statement on the evidentiary weight of an AI score was located. | Oct 19, 2026 |
| University of Wisconsin-Stout | No AI-text detector is documented. UW-Stout's own knowledge-base article describes Turnitin only as "a plagiarism checker," confirmed as a Canvas integration with no AI-writing feature named on any page swept. | Oct 19, 2026 |
| Albany State University | No AI-text detector is documented. Turnitin is confirmed only as plagiarism software for online courses. ASU's Student AI Policy instead directs students to make available, on request, their full AI-interaction transcripts. | Oct 19, 2026 |
Your institution isn't here? Its own academic-integrity office and student handbook are the right starting points — the records checklist covers locating them. Requests: hello@gatheredwork.com.