American Public University System.
- Detection status
- Copyleaks confirmed as APUS's current detection tool, integrated into the classroom Assignments tool and described by the University Library as helping students "avoid plagiarism and excessive AI use in your assignments" (migration from Turnitin completed by the University's own account, library pages updated Sep 2, 2026); a 2023 faculty blog post on APU's own site describes Turnitin's since-superseded AI-writing feature, reproduced here as historical rather than current; no automated AI exam-proctoring vendor documented — students arrange their own human proctor when a course requires one
- Office in these sources
- Student Conduct Officer (Jennifer Hawkins) · 303 West 3rd Avenue, Ranson, WV 25438 · Conduct@apus.edu · no phone published for this office specifically; general Student Support Center 877-755-2787 · apu.apus.edu — Contact Information
- Ombuds or advocacy office
- None located on the institution's own pages in this review.
- Sources last checked
- Sep 4, 2026
Reproduced from the institution's own pages quoted below — potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case.
American Public University System's (APUS — parent of American Military University and American Public University) published sources on AI detection and academic integrity, quoted and linked below. Student conduct at APUS runs through the APUS Student Code of Conduct in the online Student Handbook (sections last revised Aug 21, 2026), which distinguishes Academic Misconduct from Professional Misconduct and escalates by violation count rather than through a single campus-style hearing. A separate Generative AI Policy, effective the August 2024 session, sets citation and disclosure rules for student use of generative AI tools and states that a violation is handled under the Code of Conduct's academic-integrity provisions. Individual course syllabi and instructor guidance may add rules of their own. These are potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case — confirm applicability with the institution. Any dates are quoted from the sources, not a deadline calculation performed for you.
APUS names its detector as Copyleaks now — Turnitin's AI feature is documented only as a 2023 snapshot
The University Library's current FAQ for students names Copyleaks as the tool integrated into coursework, and states what it is used to catch (page marked Last Updated: Sep 02, 2026; retrieved Sep 4, 2026):
Source: What is Copyleaks and how do I use it? I am a student. — apus.libanswers.com. The same page states its purpose is to help students "avoid plagiarism and excessive AI use in your assignments" — the institution's own framing of Copyleaks as addressing both similarity and AI-generated content, not similarity alone. For further detail the page directs students to a separate learning module rather than stating Copyleaks' mechanics itself. Who sees results: the page's own guidance is to route Copyleaks questions to Classroom Support "and copy your instructor," implying instructor access; nothing further on the reporting chain is stated.
The matching instructor-facing page confirms the same tool and points to a fuller guide that could not be captured (page marked Last Updated: Sep 02, 2026; retrieved Sep 4, 2026):
Source: How do I use Copyleaks? I am an instructor. — apus.libanswers.com. That linked guide sits inside APUS's Brightspace learning-management system behind a student/faculty login (myclassroom.apus.edu) and could not be read for this page; it is listed by title and link only, and nothing from its contents is stated here.
Before this migration, APUS's own account of its detector was Turnitin, described in a 2023 post on APU's Education Blog by a named APU faculty member (posted 08/15/2023; retrieved Sep 4, 2026) — reproduced here as a first-party but faculty-voiced and now-dated source, not a current IT or registrar policy statement:
Source: How Does Turnitin™ Work? — apu.apus.edu Education Blog. This describes Turnitin as it stood in 2023; the current library FAQs above no longer name Turnitin as the classroom tool and name Copyleaks instead, so this quotation is reproduced as APUS's own historical record of a since-superseded deployment, not as a statement of current practice.
Exam proctoring is documented separately from text detection, and involves no automated vendor (no on-page date displayed; retrieved Sep 4, 2026): "Some courses here will require proctoring... Your professor will notify you at the beginning of the course if a proctor will be necessary." Source: Exam Proctors — apu.apus.edu. Acceptable proctors are local, human, and arranged by the student (college administrators, librarians, military education officers, or other university-approved professionals) — this is unlike the AI-driven behavioral-monitoring proctoring (Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus Monitor) documented at campus-based institutions in this collection, and no such vendor is named on any APUS page found in this review.
Stating the remaining absences at the scope actually searched: no separate graduate, doctoral, or dissertation originality-checking pipeline and no iThenticate deployment was located on APUS's own pages, including the Doctoral Handbook; no AI-detection tool beyond Copyleaks (and, historically, Turnitin) was located across the named vendors — GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus and Examity — on apus.edu, apu.apus.edu, or apus.libanswers.com. No first-party statement addressing what evidentiary weight a Copyleaks or Turnitin score carries once a conduct case is filed was located; the only weight language found is the 2023 blog post's caution, reproduced above, that a high similarity score does not by itself establish plagiarism.
What APUS's own documents say about how cases proceed
- Who may be present
- Not stated in the sources reviewed. APUS's academic-misconduct process is document-based rather than a hearing the student attends in person or by video: for a Student Conduct Board review, "[t]he student is given an opportunity to present a written statement that presents their case," and the Board "reviews all case materials including all prior violations" before deciding. Searched the Student Conduct Procedures and Appeals Process pages in full; neither addresses whether a support person, advisor, or advocate may take part, or whether any proceeding is recorded — the process as described has no live session to accompany someone to or record. — Student Conduct Procedures (Last Revision: August 21, 2026; retrieved Sep 4, 2026) · apu.apus.edu — Student Conduct Procedures
- What follows on the record
- "A copy of the letter will be placed in the student's record and may be included in background investigation requests. A Letter of Misconduct on record will deem a student ineligible for inclusion on the Dean's list, President's list, or student honor societies." A separate "Plagiarism Notation" is described the same way: "may be included in background investigation requests and may deem a student ineligible for inclusion on the Dean's list, President's list, or student honor societies." No specific retention period is stated; disclosure beyond background-investigation requests (to a graduate program or licensing board specifically) is not addressed. — Sanctions (Last Revision: August 21, 2026; retrieved Sep 4, 2026) · apu.apus.edu — Sanctions
The two questions an adviser raises first, answered from this institution's own published documents — or recorded as not stated in them.
The Generative AI Policy sets its own citation rule and states the consequence of ignoring it (effective the August 2024 session; Last Revision: August 21, 2026; retrieved Sep 4, 2026):
Source: Generative AI Policy — apu.apus.edu. The policy names no evidentiary standard of its own and states that a violation is handled under "the University's academic integrity policy in the 'Prohibited Student Conduct' section of the Student Handbook" — a hierarchy note reproduced as the policy states it.
The Student Conduct Procedures page sets out an escalation ladder rather than a single process, keyed to how many violations a student has on record:
Source: Student Conduct Procedures — apu.apus.edu. Graduate and professional students reach a Board review sooner: "2nd Academic Integrity Violation: Integrity hearing held with Conduct Board," on the stated rationale that "graduate students are held to a higher standard for academic integrity than undergraduates." No evidentiary standard (such as a preponderance-of-the-evidence rule) is named anywhere in this process; that absence is stated rather than assumed.
Appeal is addressed on a separate page, with a specific window and a named exception:
Source: Appeals Process — apu.apus.edu. What any of this means for a particular case is for the institution and its process to determine.
Where the documents live
| Document | Location |
|---|---|
| What is Copyleaks and how do I use it? I am a student. (Last Updated Sep 02, 2026 — current detection tool, student-facing) | apus.libanswers.com — Copyleaks (student) |
| How do I use Copyleaks? I am an instructor. (Last Updated Sep 02, 2026 — links to a login-gated faculty guide, not captured) | apus.libanswers.com — Copyleaks (instructor) |
| How Does Turnitin™ Work? (posted Aug. 15, 2023 — faculty blog post, superseded detector, reproduced as historical) | apu.apus.edu — Education Blog |
| Generative AI Policy (effective Aug. 2024 session; Last Revision Aug. 21, 2026) | apu.apus.edu — Generative AI Policy |
| Student Conduct Procedures (Last Revision Aug. 21, 2026 — process, escalation ladder, Board review) | apu.apus.edu — Student Conduct Procedures |
| Appeals Process (Last Revision Aug. 21, 2026 — seven-day window, grounds, 12-month maximum) | apu.apus.edu — Appeals Process |
| Sanctions (Last Revision Aug. 21, 2026 — Letter of Misconduct, Plagiarism Notation, background-investigation disclosure) | apu.apus.edu — Sanctions |
| Contact Information (Student Conduct Officer and general Student Support Center) | apu.apus.edu — Contact Information |
| Exam Proctors (proctoring is course-specific and human, not an automated vendor) | apu.apus.edu — Exam Proctors |
Organizing your own drafts and records to bring to any of this: the records checklist. Capturing the pages above as they read today, and keeping your own dated record beside them: what to do with these sources.
Revision history of this page
2026-09-04 — Page created. All quotations captured this date, first-party, from the apus.libanswers.com and apu.apus.edu pages linked beside them; every source quoted here was fetched and read as text rather than summarized. Source dates as the sources give them: the two Copyleaks LibAnswers pages are marked Last Updated: Sep 02, 2026; the Turnitin blog post is dated 08/15/2023; the Generative AI Policy states an effective date of "the August 2024 session"; the Student Conduct Procedures, Appeals Process and Sanctions pages are each marked "Last Revision: August 21, 2026"; the Contact Information page carries the same August 21, 2026 revision date; the Exam Proctors page displays no on-page date. Detection sweep recorded for a later reviewer. Named-vendor sweep — Turnitin (including SimCheck and Originality), Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity: Copyleaks found and confirmed as APUS's current classroom detection tool, addressing both plagiarism and, per the institution's own framing, "excessive AI use"; Turnitin found only as a 2023 faculty-blog description of a now-superseded deployment, current library pages naming Copyleaks in its place; no automated proctoring vendor found — proctoring is human and student-arranged; GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, iThenticate, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus and Examity: nothing located as an APUS deployment. Category sweep — the University Library's LibAnswers FAQ set and LibGuides plagiarism page; the Doctoral Handbook (no graduate-specific originality-checking pipeline located); the Student Handbook's full Code of Conduct chapter (Prohibited Student Conduct, Student Conduct Procedures, Sanctions, Appeals Process, Contact Information); the Exam Proctors and Examinations and Proctors pages. A provenance note distinct from a scope trap: the 2023 Turnitin description is a first-party page (APU's own Education Blog) but is faculty-voiced commentary rather than a registrar or IT policy statement, and it is now superseded by the institution's own current library guidance — reproduced here as historical, labeled as such, and not treated as a statement of current practice. Access limit recorded rather than assumed: "A Practical Guide for Faculty Embracing Copyleaks in Academic Integrity and Assignment Creation," linked from the instructor-facing LibAnswers page, sits inside APUS's Brightspace LMS behind a student/faculty login (myclassroom.apus.edu) and could not be fetched; nothing from its contents is stated on this page. Disqualification check run on the completed inventory: APUS has not disabled or recommended against AI detection across the board — Copyleaks is confirmed as a current, actively described deployment addressing AI-generated content specifically, so this is a confirmed-detector page, not a disqualification. Nothing paraphrase-pending — every quotation on this page was captured as text from a plain fetch. Absences recorded as findings: no evidentiary standard (such as preponderance of the evidence) is named anywhere in the Student Conduct Procedures; no source addresses whether a support person may take part in or record any part of the process, because the process described is document-based rather than a hearing the student attends; no specific retention period is stated for a Letter of Misconduct or Plagiarism Notation, and disclosure is stated only as "may be included in background investigation requests," not tied to graduate programs or licensing boards specifically; no ombuds or student-advocacy office was located anywhere on apus.edu or apu.apus.edu. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter (review confirmed 2026-09-04). Internet Archive captures: to be added.
2026-09-13 — Editorial review. Carrie Schluter read this page in full against its recorded first-party sources and found no change required. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter (review confirmed 2026-09-13).
2026-10-06 — Internet Archive captures requested by automated capture passes between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-27 and recorded this date; no human review is claimed for this entry. No quotation, date, finding or link above was changed by it. Each capture below was requested through Save Page Now and then confirmed to play back. Captures added: Student Conduct Procedures — apu.apus.edu → https://web.archive.org/web/20260926044336/https://www.apu.apus.edu/student-handbook/university-policies-and-code-of-conduct/apus-student-code-of-conduct/student-conduct-procedures/; What is Copyleaks and how do I use it? I am a student. — apus.libanswers.com → https://web.archive.org/web/20260927043459/https://apus.libanswers.com/writing/faq/2160; How do I use Copyleaks? I am an instructor. — apus.libanswers.com → https://web.archive.org/web/20260927043531/https://apus.libanswers.com/writing/faq/2161; How Does Turnitin™ Work? — apu.apus.edu Education Blog → https://web.archive.org/web/20260927043638/https://www.apu.apus.edu/area-of-study/education/resources/how-does-turnitin-work/; apu.apus.edu — Sanctions → https://web.archive.org/web/20260927043708/https://www.apu.apus.edu/student-handbook/university-policies-and-code-of-conduct/apus-student-code-of-conduct/sanctions/.
Spot an error or an outdated quotation? hello@gatheredwork.com — corrections are made on the record, in this log.