Gathered Work

Coastal Carolina University.

Detection status
Turnitin confirmed for plagiarism/similarity checking via Moodle; no AI-writing-specific Turnitin feature or any other AI-text detector is named anywhere on coastal.edu across a named-vendor and category sweep — the Code of Student Conduct treats generative AI as a conduct rule, not a detection tool
Office in these sources
Office of Academic Integrity · Frederick Wood, Academic Integrity Officer · 843-349-6594 · aiofficer@coastal.edu (no office-specific address published; contact runs through the officer directly) · coastal.edu/academicintegrity
Ombuds or advocacy office
None located on the institution's own pages in this review.
Sources last checked
Sep 28, 2026

Reproduced from the institution’s own pages quoted below — potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case.

Coastal Carolina University's published sources on AI detection and academic integrity, quoted and linked below. These are potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case — course syllabi may set narrower rules under the University's own tiered AI framework, and the Academic Integrity Code itself notes that instructors determine if, how, and when generative AI may be used in their courses. Confirm applicability with the institution. Any dates are quoted from the sources, not a deadline calculation performed for you.

01Detection status

No AI-writing detector is named as deployed at Coastal Carolina

Named-vendor sweep (Turnitin, Turnitin AI writing indicator, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) and category sweep (Moodle help pages, the University Libraries' Academic Integrity Tools guide, AI Central for students and for faculty/staff, the Office of Academic Integrity's own page, and the Code of Student Conduct) found Turnitin confirmed only for plagiarism/similarity checking, and Respondus confirmed only for exam proctoring. No first-party Coastal Carolina page states that Turnitin's AI-writing-detection feature, or any other AI-text detector, is enabled or in use.

Coastal Carolina's Moodle help page states (retrieved Sep 28, 2026):

"Does your professor use Turnitin in Moodle? View information and help tools for Turnitin here."

Source: Moodle — Student Computing Services. The University Libraries' own Academic Integrity Tools research guide (Office of Digital Learning; page dated Sep 25, 2026; retrieved Sep 28, 2026) describes the same product only in similarity-checking terms:

"Turnitin promotes academic integrity, streamlines grading and feedback, deter plagiarism, and improves student outcomes."

The same guide carries a separate heading, "Turnitin AI Detection Tool," but the two links beneath it — "About the AI Detection Tool" and "AI FAQs" — both lead to Turnitin's own external marketing pages (turnitin.com), not to a Coastal Carolina statement that the feature is turned on for any course. A link to a vendor's own description of a product is not first-party evidence that the institution has deployed it, and none is presented here as such. Source: Academic Integrity Tools — Academic Technology Resources.

The same guide also names Respondus LockDown Browser for exam proctoring, with no AI-writing-detection claim attached: "LockDown Browser is a custom browser that locks down the testing environment within a learning management system. LockDown Browser is the 'gold standard' for securing online exams in classrooms or proctored environments." Respondus Monitor is listed alongside it in the same proctoring role. Neither AI Central hub — for students or for faculty and staff (both retrieved Sep 28, 2026) — names a detection tool at all; both focus on citation, disclosure expectations, and a tiered course-level AI-use framework instead.

Where the University's own Academic Integrity Code names generative AI, it does so as a conduct rule rather than a detection capability. The 2025–2026 Code of Student Conduct (Revised July 2025; retrieved Sep 28, 2026) defines plagiarism to include:

"Borrowing words, sentences, ideas, conclusions, examples, and/or organization of an assignment without proper acknowledgment from a source (for example, a book, article, electronic document, generative artificial intelligence, or another student's paper or work, visual or audio representations, or computer software programs)." "Using generative artificial intelligence on any assessment without explicit permission of the instructor."

Source: Code of Student Conduct 2025–2026, Section III.D. These are rules about what a student may submit, not a statement that any tool checks for it.

02Published procedure

What Coastal Carolina's own pages say about how cases proceed

Who may be present
The Code's general rights section states every respondent under the Code of Student Conduct has "The right to a personal advisor, whose role is to advise the student or organization rather than actively represent." The Academic Integrity Code's own resolution process, separately, names only the instructor and the respondent as participants at the student-faculty meeting, "and may also include the student(s), faculty member(s), or staff member(s) who observed and reported the infraction." It adds: "At the request of the faculty member or student, an AIO may be present at this meeting." Both provisions are reproduced as published; neither one names the other, and recording is not addressed anywhere in the Academic Integrity Code section.
What follows on the record
No transcript notation is stated for an academic integrity violation. The available sanctions include a grade of FX in the course, which the Code states means "the student will not be able to drop the course, petition a grade change, or use the grade forgiveness policy" — a course-level consequence, not a stated transcript flag. On retention, the Code states elsewhere that "[d]isciplinary records not involving a suspension or permanent dismissal from the University are maintained for a period of seven years. Records resulting in a suspension or permanent dismissal of a student will be retained for a period of time no less than 99 years," while separately stating that academic integrity case files specifically are "maintained by the Office of Academic Integrity" rather than by the Dean of Students Office the retention clause describes — both reproduced, not reconciled. No disclosure provision (to graduate programs, employers, or licensing boards) was located.

The two questions an adviser raises first, answered from this institution’s own published documents — or recorded as not stated in them.

From the Code of Student Conduct 2025–2026 (Revised July 2025; retrieved Sep 28, 2026), Section III.E, Resolution Process for Academic Violations:

"Alleged academic violations should be reported in writing to the instructor of the class or to the Office of Academic Integrity within 10 business days of receiving knowledge of a possible violation." "Within 10 business days of receiving knowledge of a possible violation, the student will receive written notice from the Office of Academic Integrity of: […] The date, time, and location of student-faculty meeting, which will take place no later than 10 business days from the date of notice." "The student may respond to the alleged violation(s) in writing to the Office of Academic Integrity in advance of the meeting and/or may respond verbally at the meeting. If a student does not attend the meeting, the meeting may proceed in the student's absence." "The student may submit a written request for an appeal hearing to the Office of Academic Integrity. […] The request for an appeal hearing must be made within five calendar days of receiving the decision of the faculty member from the student-faculty meeting." "If the student believes that due process has failed or that substantive issues related to the case were not reviewed at the CAIC hearing, the student may submit a written appeal to the dean of the college in which the course under consideration was offered. Appeals must be submitted within five days of receiving the decision of the CAIC."

The Code's general rights section separately states that "[t]he preponderance of the evidence is the default standard of proof for determining violations of the Code of Student Conduct," an exception list that does not name the Academic Integrity Code; that general standard is reproduced here because the Academic Integrity Code's own resolution process does not restate an evidentiary standard of its own. Sanctions at the student-faculty stage range from a written warning through a grade of F on the assignment or in the course, FX in the course, or an academic integrity workshop; a second violation is referred to the College Academic Integrity Committee (CAIC), which may also impose disciplinary suspension or permanent dismissal. The Code states that the dean's decision on an appeal from a CAIC hearing is the final step of the resolution process, with no further campus-internal appeal named. Source: Code of Student Conduct 2025–2026, Sections II.B.2 and III.E–F. What any of this means for a particular case is for the institution and its process to determine.

03Source map

Where the documents live

DocumentLocation
Code of Student Conduct 2025–2026 (Academic Integrity Code, Section III)coastal.edu — Code of Student Conduct 2025–2026 (Revised July 2025; retrieved Sep 28, 2026)
Office of Academic Integritycoastal.edu/academicintegrity · Frederick Wood, Academic Integrity Officer · 843-349-6594 · aiofficer@coastal.edu (retrieved Sep 28, 2026)
Academic Integrity Tools — Academic Technology Resources (Office of Digital Learning research guide)coastal-provostoffice.libguides.com — Academic Integrity Tools (page dated Sep 25, 2026; retrieved Sep 28, 2026)
Moodle — Student Computing Servicescoastal.edu/scs/moodle (retrieved Sep 28, 2026)
AI Central — Students and Families AI Guidelines and Resourcescoastal.edu/aboutccu/ai-central — Students and Families (retrieved Sep 28, 2026)
AI Central — Faculty and Staff AI Guidance and Resourcescoastal.edu/aboutccu/ai-central — Faculty and Staff (retrieved Sep 28, 2026)
Ombuds Services (serves faculty and staff only)coastal.edu/ombuds (retrieved Sep 28, 2026)
Student Empowerment and Advocacy — Student Resourcescoastal.edu/sea/studentresources (retrieved Sep 28, 2026)

Organizing your own drafts and records to bring to any of this: the records checklist. Capturing the pages above as they read today, and keeping your own dated record beside them: what to do with these sources.

04Change log

Revision history of this page

2026-09-28 — Page created by a scheduled, unattended build pass. All quotations retrieved this date from coastal.edu pages linked beside them, from the Office of Digital Learning's Academic Integrity Tools research guide (page dated Sep 25, 2026), and from the Code of Student Conduct 2025–2026 PDF (Revised July 2025, the current edition live on coastal.edu at build time). Detection-inventory sweep performed: named-vendor sweep (Turnitin, Turnitin AI writing indicator, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) and category sweep (Moodle help pages, the Libraries' Academic Technology Resources guide, both AI Central hubs, the Office of Academic Integrity's own page, and the Code of Student Conduct) came back empty of any first-party statement that an AI-text detector is deployed. NOT DISQUALIFIED: this is an empty inventory, not a documented deactivation or a recommendation against detection — Coastal Carolina's pages are simply silent on AI-writing detection specifically, while confirming Turnitin for similarity/plagiarism checking and Respondus for exam proctoring. The Libraries' own guide links to Turnitin's external AI-detection marketing pages under a "Turnitin AI Detection Tool" heading, but that heading carries no Coastal Carolina statement that the feature is enabled; recorded as a listed-but-unconfirmed link, not evidence of deployment. PROCESS SOURCE: Section III (Academic Integrity Code) of the Code of Student Conduct 2025–2026, cross-checked against Section II's general respondent-rights list for the evidentiary standard and personal-advisor right, since Section III's own resolution process does not restate either. DIVERGENCE reproduced, not resolved: Section II states a general right to a personal advisor for any Code of Student Conduct case; Section III's own academic-violation hearing process names only the instructor, the respondent, and (on request) an academic integrity officer as participants, without mentioning an advisor. SUBSTANTIVE ABSENCE: no transcript-notation provision is stated for an academic integrity violation (the FX sanction is course-level only); the Code's general seven-year/99-year retention clause is stated for records maintained by the Dean of Students Office, while academic integrity case files are separately stated to be maintained by the Office of Academic Integrity, and the Code does not say whether the same retention schedule applies to the latter; no disclosure provision was located. OFFICE: the Office of Academic Integrity publishes only a named officer's phone and email (Frederick Wood, 843-349-6594, aiofficer@coastal.edu), with no office-specific address; the university's general campus address appears only in the page footer and is not presented here as the office's own. OMBUDS/ADVOCACY CHECKED, NONE FOUND FOR STUDENTS: Coastal Carolina's Ombuds Services page states plainly, "Ombuds Services offered by Coastal Carolina University currently serve both faculty and staff" — excluding students by its own terms. Student Empowerment and Advocacy (Dean of Students Office) is student-facing but names no academic-integrity scope among its listed services and states its own limits rather than describing itself as confidential or independent: "Student Empowerment and Advocacy is not therapy. […] While confidentiality cannot be guaranteed, information will only be shared strictly on a need-to-know basis." Neither was substituted for an ombuds; docket states none located. TRANSPORT NOTE: a search engine's own indexing attributes the Academic Integrity Tools guide to a "coastal-grad.libguides.com" address, which does not resolve; the live guide is served from coastal-provostoffice.libguides.com at the same catalog parameters and was fetched directly from there. Nothing paraphrase-pending. Subreddit demand scan not run (outside this run's research method). Internet Archive captures: to be added. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter (review confirmed 2026-09-28).

2026-10-06 — Internet Archive captures requested on 2026-09-28 by an automated capture pass and recorded this date; no human review is claimed for this entry. No quotation, date, finding or link above was changed by it. Each capture below was requested through Save Page Now and then confirmed to play back. Captures added: for students → https://web.archive.org/web/20260928121049/https://www.coastal.edu/aboutccu/ai-central/students-and-families-ai-guidelines-and-resources/; coastal.edu/academicintegrity → https://web.archive.org/web/20260928121200/https://www.coastal.edu/academicintegrity/; Code of Student Conduct 2025–2026 → https://web.archive.org/web/20260928121228/https://www.coastal.edu/media/2024siteassets/contentassets/documents/deanofstudentsoffice/codeofstudentconduct/CodeofStudentConduct2025-2026.pdf; coastal.edu/ombuds → https://web.archive.org/web/20260928121250/https://www.coastal.edu/ombuds/; Moodle — Student Computing Services → https://web.archive.org/web/20260928121332/https://www.coastal.edu/scs/moodle/; coastal.edu/sea/studentresources → https://web.archive.org/web/20260928121408/https://www.coastal.edu/sea/studentresources/.

Spot an error or an outdated quotation? hello@gatheredwork.com — corrections are made on the record, in this log.