California State University, Dominguez Hills.

Detection status: Turnitin AI writing detection confirmed deployed campus-wide in Canvas since Aug 25, 2025, visible to instructors only and not, in Turnitin's own words reproduced by CSUDH, "the sole basis for action or a definitive grading measure"
Office in these sources: Office of Community Standards · Welch Hall 480, 1000 E. Victoria Street, Carson, CA 90747 · 310-243-3784 · dh_conduct@csudh.edu
Ombuds or advocacy office: None located on the institution's own pages in this review.
Sources last checked: Sep 21, 2026

Reproduced from the institution's own pages quoted below — potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case.

California State University, Dominguez Hills's published sources on AI detection and academic integrity, quoted and linked below. CSUDH's documents sit in two layers: campus pages from Academic Technology and Student Conduct, and systemwide California State University procedure (Executive Order 1098). These are potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case — course syllabi may also set additional rules. Confirm applicability with the institution. Any dates are quoted from the sources, not a deadline calculation performed for you.

01Detection status

Turnitin's AI writing detection is deployed at CSUDH

A named-vendor sweep (Turnitin/SimCheck/Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) and a category sweep of Academic Technology's Canvas Resources site, the University Library's AI guides, and the Academic Integrity page found one deployed AI-text detector and no others.

Academic Technology's own Canvas Resources site announced the feature this way (post dated Aug 19, 2025; retrieved Sep 21, 2026):

"Turnitin Originality, the centrally supported originality and plagiarism checker made available by Academic Technology per many requests from faculty through its Canvas learning management system, is adding a feature to scan for writing generated by artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as ChatGPT." "Instructors should be cautious about relying fully on results from the system because it may return false positives or fail to detect some AI-generated material." "We only flag something as AI-written when we are 98% sure it is written by AI. […] This means, however, that we will likely miss up to 15% of text written by AI, with a less than 1% false positive rate (incorrectly identifying fully human-written text as AI-generated). While Turnitin has confidence in its model, Turnitin does not make a determination of misconduct, rather it provides data for the educators to make an informed decision based on their academic and institutional policies. Hence, we must emphasize that the percentage on the AI writing indicator should not be used as the sole basis for action or a definitive grading measure by instructors." "All submissions made to Turnitin after August 25th will automatically be checked for AI writing. The AI writing detection indicator and report will only display to instructors and is not visible to students."

Source: August 2025 Canvas Updates — Canvas Resources, Academic Technology. The University Library's own AI-literacy guide discusses AI-detection tools only in general, evaluative terms — how classifiers work, false-positive/false-negative tradeoffs, and bias risk for second-language and dialect writers — and does not itself state that CSUDH has deployed one; it cites, among other outside readings, Vanderbilt University's own announcement disabling Turnitin's AI detector. It is quoted here only for that provenance, not as a CSUDH deployment statement. Source: AI Detectors — Using and Evaluating AI Tools, University Library (retrieved Sep 21, 2026; no on-page revision date). No other named-vendor or category-sweep result named a second AI-text detector; Turnitin is CSUDH's only confirmed deployment.

02Published process

What CSUDH's own pages say about how cases proceed

Who may be present: "Both the Complainant and the Student charged may elect to be accompanied by an Advisor of their choice, subject to the limitations set forth in this section, to any meetings, conferences, interviews or hearings." The Advisor's role is limited: "Whoever is selected as an Advisor is limited to observing and consulting with, and providing support to, the Complainant, witness, or Student charged. An Advisor may not speak on a Student's or Complainant's behalf." On recording: "The Hearing Officer shall make an official audio recording of the hearing […]. The recording is University Property. No other recording of the hearing is permitted." — CSU Executive Order 1098, the systemwide student conduct procedure (revision effective Oct 6, 2023, read from a CSU-campus-hosted copy, since calstate.policystat.com — the official host — is not reliably plain-fetchable and CSUDH's own hosted copy is the superseded 2019 revision; retrieved Sep 21, 2026) · Executive Order 1098 (PDF, CSU Chico–hosted copy)
What follows on the record: "Suspension of one academic year or more, withdrawals in lieu of suspension, and withdrawals with pending misconduct investigations or disciplinary proceedings shall be entered on the Student's transcript permanently without exception"; the same rule applies to expulsion. Lesser sanctions ("A record of disciplinary probation or suspension") are "entered on a Student's transcript, with beginning and end date, for the duration of the sanction," and the hearing's official audio recording "shall be retained by the Student Conduct Administrator in accordance with the Campus records/ information retention and disposition schedule." — CSU Executive Order 1098, Article V (same source as above)

The two questions an adviser raises first, answered from this institution's own published documents — or recorded as not stated in them.

CSUDH's own Student Conduct Procedures page describes the local starting point (retrieved Sep 21, 2026):

"The CSU Student Conduct Process (EO 1098) establishes the procedures for addressing these matters. Students participating in the process receive notice of the alleged violations and an opportunity to respond. Matters may be resolved through a resolution agreement when appropriate. If a matter cannot be resolved through an agreement, it may proceed to a formal hearing consistent with the CSU Student Conduct Process. Submitting a report does not establish that a student violated university policy." "The Office of Community Standards reviews each report and determines the appropriate response based on the available information."

Source: Student Conduct Procedures. Executive Order 1098 supplies the standard of proof and the sanction it applies to: "The standard of proof the Hearing Officer shall use is whether the University's charge is sustained by a Preponderance of the Evidence. It is the University's burden to show that it is 'more likely than not' that the Student violated the Student Conduct Code." A separate, older page — "Academic Integrity," last substantively developed by a 1996 Academic Senate subcommittee and still linked from Student Conduct — describes faculty-level "Detecting and Preventing Dishonesty" practices and academic-integrity philosophy but states no advisor, recording, appeal-window, or transcript rule of its own; the procedural facts above come from Executive Order 1098 and the current Student Conduct Procedures page rather than from that older page. Source: Academic Integrity. What these quotations mean for any particular case is for the institution and its process to determine; they are reproduced so you can read the originals in context.

03Source map

Where the documents live

Document	Location
August 2025 Canvas Updates — Turnitin AI writing detection announcement	at.csudh.edu — August 2025 Canvas Updates
AI Detectors — Using and Evaluating AI Tools (University Library)	libguides.csudh.edu — AI Detectors
Academic Integrity (Student Conduct)	csudh.edu — Academic Integrity
Student Conduct Procedures	csudh.edu — Student Conduct Procedures
CSU Executive Order 1098 (systemwide conduct procedure; official copy at calstate.policystat.com is not reliably plain-fetchable, so a CSU-campus-hosted copy of the same, current revision is read instead)	csuchico.edu — EO 1098 (PDF)
Office of Community Standards	Welch Hall 480, 1000 E. Victoria Street, Carson, CA 90747 · 310-243-3784 · dh_conduct@csudh.edu (from the office's own page, retrieved Sep 21, 2026) — csudh.edu/student-conduct

Organizing your own drafts and records to bring to any of this: the records checklist. Capturing the pages above as they read today, and keeping your own dated record beside them: what to do with these sources.

04Change log

Revision history of this page

2026-09-21 — Page created by an automated build pass; no human review is claimed for this entry. First-party material captured this date from at.csudh.edu (August 2025 Canvas Updates, dated Aug 19, 2025), libguides.csudh.edu (AI Detectors guide, no on-page date), csudh.edu (Academic Integrity and Student Conduct Procedures pages, neither dated on its face), and CSU Executive Order 1098 (revision effective Oct 6, 2023), read from a CSU Chico–hosted copy because the official calstate.policystat.com host is not reliably plain-fetchable — the same substitution this collection already uses for csuf, csulb, csun and sfsu. CSUDH does host its own copy of EO 1098, but it is the superseded March 29, 2019 revision; the current 2023 revision was used instead and the page says so. Named-vendor sweep and category sweep both found exactly one deployed AI-text detector: Turnitin's AI writing indicator, confirmed campus-wide in Canvas since Aug 25, 2025, instructor-visible only. The Library's AI Detectors guide is general evaluative material about AI detectors as a technology, not a CSUDH deployment statement, and is quoted on the page only with that provenance; it cites Vanderbilt's own disabling announcement as outside reading, which is not carried onto this page as anything about CSUDH. OMBUDS: no functioning office located. A 2006 Academic Affairs policy document (AA 2006-32, Student Retention Policy Council) lists "The Director of the University Advisement Center and Academic Ombudsperson" among committee seats, but no current, substantive csudh.edu page describes an ombudsperson function, scope, or confidentiality standing behind that title, and the University Advisement Center's own current landing page has been folded into a general "Academics" page describing college-level advising, not an independent complaint-resolution office. The title is recorded here as a deliberate omission rather than presented as an available office, per the rule against characterizing an office as independent or confidential without the institution's own description. Nothing paraphrase-pending. Internet Archive captures pending — to be requested by a later capture pass. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter (review confirmed 2026-09-21).

Spot an error or an outdated quotation? hello@gatheredwork.com — corrections are made on the record, in this log.