University of Colorado Denver.

What CU Denver's own pages say about how cases proceed

Who may be present

"A support person is not permitted to speak for, or on behalf of, the individual at any time," but "[w]ith permission from the meeting facilitator … an advisor or support person may make a statement and/or ask questions of the student to present relevant information." An advisor may be "a parent/guardian, partner, lawyer, staff or faculty from the University, mental health provider, and/or friend." Recording is not addressed anywhere in the pages reviewed. — Information for Advisors and Support People (no on-page date; retrieved Sep 17, 2026) · Information for Advisors and Support People

What follows on the record

Not stated in the sources reviewed. The Academic Misconduct, GenAI and Academic Integrity, AIC Hearing, and Advisors/Support People pages describe sanctions (including suspension and expulsion) and appeal but state no transcript notation, retention period, or disclosure provision; the Academic Misconduct page does state that a not-responsible finding "would not negatively reflect on the student's academic record." — Academic Misconduct (no on-page date; retrieved Sep 17, 2026) · Academic Misconduct

The two questions an adviser raises first, answered from this institution's own published documents — or recorded as not stated in them.

From the Academic Misconduct procedure page (no on-page date; retrieved Sep 17, 2026):

Where a case escalates, the Academic Integrity Committee (AIC) Hearing page (retrieved Sep 17, 2026) states the same preponderance standard applies — "The AIC Members will make their decision based on a preponderance of the evidence … in the case of a tie vote, the finding will be in favor of the student since the burden of proof resides with the faculty member" — and that a student may appeal an AIC decision on one of three grounds: "[a]pparent bias," "[a] failure to follow designated procedures that significantly impacted the outcome," or "[a]n assigned sanction that is largely disproportionate to the finding of responsibility." The page states no window in days for filing that appeal and adds: "Please be aware that appeal decisions are final." Source: AIC Hearing. What these quotations mean for any particular case is for the institution and its process to determine; they are reproduced so you can read the originals in context.

Revision history of this page

2026-09-17 — Page created. Priority A tranche 4, entry 129 (cold build, no prior CANDIDATES.md/procedure-facts.json research to reuse). CU Boulder is Excluded independently in this collection (2026-08-24, campus OIT page); no inference was drawn either way between campuses, and this entry's research and sources are entirely CU Denver's own. Detection: Turnitin confirmed deployed for originality/plagiarism checking only, with no AI-writing-detection feature mentioned on its own Teaching with Technology page. The Academic Integrity landing page for faculty states "[c]ontact the SCCS for information about various generative AI detection tools, such as Pangram" — Pangram is named, but the sentence offers to discuss options rather than stating one is licensed or deployed; treated as a named example, not a confirmed deployment, and not presented as a detector CU Denver is documented to use. Named-vendor sweep (Turnitin, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity, Pangram) and category sweep (Teaching Innovation and Program Strategy pages, the Academic Integrity/GenAI/Academic Misconduct/AIC Hearing procedure pages) found no other AI-text detector named. NOT DISQUALIFIED: no CU Denver page states that any detector is disabled or recommended against; this is a partial/ambiguous inventory rather than a clean absence or a clean deployment. Process captured in full from the Academic Misconduct and AIC Hearing pages: faculty-level meeting within three to five business days of notice; preponderance-of-the-information standard, stated explicitly at both the faculty and AIC-hearing stages, with the burden on the faculty member and ties resolved in the student's favor; sanction categories (academic, educational, advocacy, disciplinary) up to and including suspension or expulsion; AIC hearing on prior-violation, student appeal, or faculty request; three-ground appeal of an AIC decision (bias, procedural failure, disproportionate sanction) with no stated day-window and appeal decisions stated to be final. Accompaniment captured from the dedicated Advisors and Support People page: a support person "is not permitted to speak for, or on behalf of, the individual at any time" absent the facilitator's permission, and may be an attorney. NOT STATED IN THE SOURCES REVIEWED: recording of any meeting or hearing, transcript notation, record-retention period, or disclosure to a graduate program, employer, or licensing board — the Academic Misconduct page states only that a not-responsible finding "would not negatively reflect on the student's academic record," which is not a statement about a responsible finding's record treatment. OMBUDS FOUND AND ELIGIBLE: the CU Denver Ombuds Office serves "students, faculty and staff," described in its own words as confidential, independent, impartial, and informal. Office: Student Conduct & Community Standards, Student Commons Building, 1201 Larimer Street #2007, Denver, CO 80204, 303-315-7311, StudentConduct@ucdenver.edu — captured from the office's own contact block, repeated identically across every SCCS page fetched. Nothing paraphrase-pending. Traces to tools/packets/cudenver-packet.txt with zero failures; gated in tools/fidelity-gate.txt. Archive captures pending — not requested this pass (unattended scheduled run). Reviewer: Carrie Schluter (review confirmed 2026-09-17).

2026-09-17 — Internet Archive captures requested this date by an automated capture pass; no human review is claimed for this entry. No quotation, date, finding or link above was changed by it. Each capture below was requested through Save Page Now and then confirmed to play back. Captures added: Ombuds Office, CU Denver → https://web.archive.org/web/20260917113918/https://www.ucdenver.edu/offices/ombudsoffice/home; Turnitin → https://web.archive.org/web/20260917114045/https://www.ucdenver.edu/tips/resources/teachingwithtech/turnitin; Academic Integrity | Student Conduct at CU Denver → https://web.archive.org/web/20260917113435/https://www.cudenver.edu/student-conduct/academic-integrity; GenAI and Academic Integrity | Student Conduct at CU Denver → https://web.archive.org/web/20260917113213/https://www.cudenver.edu/student-conduct/academic-integrity/genai-and-academic-integrity; Information for Advisors and Support People | Student Conduct at CU Denver → https://web.archive.org/web/20260917113353/https://www.cudenver.edu/student-conduct/information-for-advisors-and-support-people; Academic Misconduct | Student Conduct at CU Denver → https://web.archive.org/web/20260917113106/https://www.cudenver.edu/student-conduct/academic-integrity/academic-misconduct; AIC Hearing | Student Conduct at CU Denver → https://web.archive.org/web/20260917113141/https://www.cudenver.edu/student-conduct/academic-integrity/aic-hearing.

Spot an error or an outdated quotation? hello@gatheredwork.com — corrections are made on the record, in this log.