Ferris State University.

What the Academic Misconduct Resolution Process and the Code of Student Community Standards say about how cases proceed

Who may be present

"The student has the right to have an advisor accompany them throughout disciplinary proceedings. An advisor is any individual chosen by the student to provide support before, during and after the academic misconduct process. This person may be an attorney, but at no point may this individual represent in place of the individual they are present to support." Where a case is referred to the Office of Student Community Standards, the Code states the same limits and adds a recording rule: "The Conduct Conference will be audio recorded or transcribed. The audio recording or transcription will be made available to the parties for inspection and review on reasonable notice, including for use in preparing any subsequent appeal." Sources: Academic Affairs Academic Misconduct Resolution Process and Code of Student Community Standards, Section 2.

What follows on the record

The Office of Student Community Standards' own FAQ states broadly, "No, participation in the conduct process is not marked on your transcript. Conduct records are maintained in accordance with federal law and are kept separately from academic records." — but the Code of Student Community Standards itself states a specific exception for suspension or dismissal: "an AW (Administrative Withdraw) will be indicated on the student's file by the Registrar's Office. An AW will be placed on the student's transcript if the withdrawal is complete prior to the deadline for withdrawal from classes," or an AWF (computed into the GPA at zero) if after that deadline. Separately: "All conduct records are maintained by the University for at least seven (7) years from the time of their creation except those that result in suspension or dismissal, which are maintained indefinitely." Academic Misconduct violations resolved informally, outside the Resolution Process guidelines, are "not part of the student official disciplinary record." Sources: Office of Student Community Standards FAQ and Code of Student Community Standards, Sections 2 and 5.

The two questions an adviser raises first, answered from this institution's own published documents — or recorded as not stated in them.

The Academic Misconduct Resolution Process (retrieved Oct 3, 2026) describes a two-track system. Most academic misconduct is resolved directly between instructor and student:

The Code of Student Community Standards itself confirms the referral path to its own process: "Allegations of academic integrity violations are addressed via the Academic Affairs Academic Misconduct Process. Students involved in egregious and/or repeated acts of academic misconduct are referred to the Office of Student Community Standards for allegations of academic misconduct." The Code's own decision standard matches: "The Conduct Case Manager shall make a finding as to whether the student has committed only the violation(s) as charged based on a preponderance of the evidence." Sources: Academic Affairs Academic Misconduct Resolution Process and Code of Student Community Standards (2026-2027 edition, implemented Aug. 17, 2026). What these quotations mean for any particular case is for the institution and its process to determine.

Revision history of this page

2026-10-03 — Page created. Cold build; no prior CANDIDATES.md or procedure-facts.json research to reuse. Named-vendor sweep (Turnitin AI writing indicator, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) and category sweep (University Policies' Academic Affairs pages, the Academic Integrity Policy and Academic Misconduct Resolution Process, the Code of Student Community Standards, and general web search for a Ferris-specific Turnitin/SafeAssign knowledge-base article) found no detector of any kind, not even a plain plagiarism-similarity tool, named as deployed anywhere on ferris.edu. This is a genuinely empty inventory rather than the more common pattern in this collection of "Turnitin confirmed for plagiarism, no AI feature named" — no detector of either kind surfaced. NOT DISQUALIFIED: absence, not a documented deactivation. CLIENT-RENDERED SOURCE: the Code of Student Community Standards is hosted on a Ferris360/Symplicity-style portal (360.ferris.edu) that serves only a JavaScript shell to a plain fetch; read via the built-in browser transport instead (full text rendered after a few seconds), and the quoted text was taken from that rendered page. PROCESS, TWO-TRACK SYSTEM CONFIRMED BY THE CODE ITSELF: the Academic Misconduct Resolution Process (instructor-level, Associate Provost of Academic Operations copied) handles most cases up to an F in the course, using the preponderance standard and a non-participating Advisor/attorney right, with a 7-day appeal on three named grounds; the Code of Student Community Standards' own text confirms "[s]tudents involved in egregious and/or repeated acts of academic misconduct are referred to the Office of Student Community Standards," whose own process adds a recorded-or-transcribed Conduct Conference and the Code's general sanctions, retention, and transcript provisions. TRANSCRIPT DIVERGENCE REPRODUCED, NOT RESOLVED: the OSCS FAQ's plain-language answer ("participation in the conduct process is not marked on your transcript") is reproduced alongside the Code's own, more specific AW/AWF transcript-notation rule for suspension or dismissal, which the FAQ's blanket answer does not mention — both are quoted rather than one silently preferred over the other. EMAIL DECODED: the Associate Provost of Academic Operations' email is published on the University Complaint Contacts page only as Cloudflare-obfuscated markup (data-cfemail); decoded using that encoding's standard, documented reversal (XOR against the first byte) to AcademicAffairs@Ferris.edu and recorded as such, the same technique and disclosure used at cityuseattle in this collection. OMBUDS/ADVOCACY CHECKED AND NOT FOUND: no office titled ombudsperson or ombudsman was located anywhere on ferris.edu; the only complaint contacts for non-academic matters are the Dean of Student Life and the Director of Equal Opportunity, neither described as independent, confidential, or neutral, and neither substituted for an ombuds. Nothing paraphrase-pending. Archive captures pending — not requested this pass (unattended scheduled run). Reviewer: Carrie Schluter (review confirmed 2026-10-03).

2026-10-06 — Internet Archive captures requested on 2026-10-04 by an automated capture pass and recorded this date; no human review is claimed for this entry. No quotation, date, finding or link above was changed by it. Each capture below was requested through Save Page Now and then confirmed to play back. Captures added: Code of Student Community Standards → https://web.archive.org/web/20261004042554/https://360.ferris.edu/external/pages/code-of-student-community-standards; Academic Affairs Academic Integrity Policy — University Policies & Procedures → https://web.archive.org/web/20261004042627/https://www.ferris.edu/policies/academic-affairs-academic-integrity-policy.htm; Academic Affairs Academic Misconduct Resolution Process → https://web.archive.org/web/20261004042659/https://www.ferris.edu/policies/academic-affairs-academic-misconduct-resolution-process.htm; ferris.edu — University Complaint Contacts → https://web.archive.org/web/20261004042732/https://www.ferris.edu/policies/student-complaint-policy.htm; ferris.edu — OSCS Homepage/FAQ → https://web.archive.org/web/20261004042805/https://www.ferris.edu/student-life/student-community-standards/homepage.htm.

Spot an error or an outdated quotation? hello@gatheredwork.com — corrections are made on the record, in this log.