Morehead State University.
- Detection status
- No AI-text detector is named as deployed anywhere in MSU's own pages; its AI Task Force, Library AI guide, and Canvas FAQs are entirely about using AI, not detecting it, and the Canvas FAQ's full question list names only Respondus LockDown Browser/Monitor, an exam-proctoring tool
- Office in these sources
- Office of the Dean of Students & Student Wellbeing · 227 ADUC · 606-783-2070 · jmyarabeck@moreheadstate.edu
- Ombuds or advocacy office
- None located on the institution's own pages in this review.
- Sources last checked
- Oct 9, 2026
Reproduced from the institution's own pages quoted below — potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case.
MSU's published sources on AI detection and academic integrity, quoted and linked below. These are potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case — course syllabi may also apply, since UAR 145 itself says instructors may add course-specific guidance. Confirm applicability with the institution. Any dates are quoted from the sources, not a deadline calculation performed for you.
No AI-text detector found in MSU's own pages
MSU's AI Task Force page (Academic Affairs, no on-page date displayed; retrieved Oct 9, 2026) and the library's companion guide are both framed around using generative AI responsibly, not detecting it. The library guide states its own scope directly:
Source: AI at MSU — Camden-Carroll Library (no on-page date displayed; retrieved Oct 9, 2026). Neither this guide nor the AI Task Force page names Turnitin, Copyleaks, GPTZero, Originality.ai, or any other AI-writing detector.
MSU is mid-transition from Blackboard to Canvas as its learning management system, "[b]eginning with the Winter 2026 term." Its Canvas FAQ page lists its full set of covered questions by title (no on-page date displayed; retrieved Oct 9, 2026); none concerns plagiarism or AI-text detection, and the only integrity-adjacent tool named is exam-proctoring software:
Source: Canvas Frequently Asked Questions. Respondus LockDown Browser and Monitor lock down and record the testing environment during an exam; nothing in the FAQ's question list claims either evaluates writing for AI generation, so it is recorded here as a proctoring tool, not a detector.
Scope of the search behind the above: a named-vendor sweep (Turnitin and its AI-writing indicator, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) run directly against moreheadstate.edu and moreheadstate.libguides.com, plus a category sweep of the AI Task Force page, the library's AI guide, UAR 145 (Student Academic Misconduct), the Eagle Student Handbook's Academic Misconduct page, and the Canvas FAQ hub. The only matches for "Turnitin" were false positives ("turn it in") in unrelated archived documents. This is an empty inventory, not a documented prior deactivation of a named tool — no MSU page states that a detector was ever purchased, enabled, or turned off.
What MSU's own pages say about how cases proceed
- Who may be present
- At the Academic Appeals Hearing: "The student and the instructor may be accompanied by an advisor selected from among the university's student body, faculty, or staff. The advisor serves only in a support role and may not participate in the direct examination, cross-examination, or arguments during the Hearing." Recording is addressed directly: "All proceedings, except deliberations in executive session, will be recorded." — UAR 145, Student Academic Misconduct (adopted Oct 21, 2022; retrieved Oct 9, 2026).
- What follows on the record
- "In accordance with Series U0422, State Agency Records Retention Schedule, files documenting Academic Misconduct (Academic Honesty Violation) are maintained permanently in the student's conduct record, unless otherwise specified, and retained in the Office of the Dean of Students." — UAR 145, Appendix B (adopted Oct 21, 2022; retrieved Oct 9, 2026). Transcript notation and disclosure to a party outside the University are not stated in the sources reviewed.
The two questions an adviser raises first, answered from this institution's own published documents — or recorded as not stated in them.
UAR 145, "Student Academic Misconduct" (initial adoption October 21, 2022, no revision date displayed; retrieved Oct 9, 2026), sets out a seven-step process beginning with the instructor:
Source: UAR 145 — Student Academic Misconduct. The process runs instructor conference, then department Chair/Associate Dean, with appeal first to the academic Dean and then, on the same four grounds, to the Academic Appeals Committee (9 faculty, 4 students, 2 staff); only that Committee may impose Removal from Course, Probated Academic Suspension, or Academic Suspension, and a student suspended by the Committee may appeal further to the University President. Sanctions otherwise range from an Oral Reprimand through Failure of Course and Program Removal. What these quotations mean for any particular case is for the institution and its process to determine; they are reproduced so you can read the originals in context.
Where the documents live
| Document | Location |
|---|---|
| AI at MSU — About AI (detector/tool inventory) | moreheadstate.libguides.com/airesources (no on-page date displayed; retrieved Oct 9, 2026) |
| Artificial Intelligence — AI Task Force (detector/tool inventory) | moreheadstate.edu — Artificial Intelligence (no on-page date displayed; retrieved Oct 9, 2026) |
| Canvas Frequently Asked Questions (detector/tool inventory, Respondus named) | moreheadstate.edu — Canvas FAQs (no on-page date displayed; retrieved Oct 9, 2026) |
| UAR 145 — Student Academic Misconduct (definitions, adjudication procedure, appeals, sanctions, record retention) | moreheadstate.edu — UAR 145 (PDF) (initial adoption Oct 21, 2022; retrieved Oct 9, 2026) |
| Academic Misconduct — Eagle Student Handbook (office contact, UAR 145 cross-reference) | moreheadstate.edu — Academic Misconduct (no on-page date displayed; retrieved Oct 9, 2026) |
Organizing your own drafts and records to bring to any of this: the records checklist. Capturing the pages above as they read today, and keeping your own dated record beside them: what to do with these sources.
Revision history of this page
2026-10-09 — Page created in an unattended scheduled build pass; not a human review. All quotations retrieved this date from the pages linked beside them; UAR 145 is the only source carrying an on-page date, its own "Initial Adoption: October 21, 2022" line, with no revision date filled in. A named-vendor sweep (Turnitin and its AI-writing indicator, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) run directly against moreheadstate.edu and moreheadstate.libguides.com returned no AI-writing or plagiarism-detection product; the only "Turnitin" matches were false positives ("turn it in") inside unrelated archived documents in the university's digital-archives subdomain. A category sweep of the AI Task Force page, the library's AI guide, UAR 145, the Eagle Student Handbook's Academic Misconduct page, and the Canvas FAQ hub found nothing further. LMS transition noted, not treated as a finding. MSU is migrating from Blackboard to Canvas, "[b]eginning with the Winter 2026 term"; the Canvas FAQ's full set of question titles was read, and none concerns plagiarism or AI-text detection — only Respondus LockDown Browser/Monitor (exam proctoring) is named. A prior-era "Blackboard" plagiarism-detection reference located only in a 2010s internal thesis in the university's digital archives was not used, as it is not a current first-party institutional statement. Ombuds search. Searches for "ombuds" and "student advocacy" surfaced only a c. 2012 internal Staff Congress/Executive Council discussion about possibly creating an Ombuds office, never confirmed elsewhere as having resulted in a current office, and unrelated SGA/Residence Hall Association "student advocacy" committee language; neither was treated as evidence of a present-day ombuds or advocacy office. Record question. UAR 145 states permanent retention of the misconduct file in the Dean of Students' office under a cited state records-retention schedule; it does not mention a transcript notation or a disclosure rule for a party outside the University, recorded as not stated rather than assumed. Internet Archive captures: to be added. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter (review confirmed 2026-10-09).
2026-10-09 — Internet Archive captures requested this date by an automated capture pass; no human review is claimed for this entry. No quotation, date, finding or link above was changed by it. Each capture below was requested through Save Page Now and then confirmed to play back. Captures added: moreheadstate.edu — Artificial Intelligence → https://web.archive.org/web/20261009123640/https://www.moreheadstate.edu/academics/academic-affairs/instructional-design-online-learning/ai/; Canvas Frequently Asked Questions → https://web.archive.org/web/20261009123751/https://www.moreheadstate.edu/academics/academic-affairs/instructional-design-online-learning/canvas-information-hub/canvas-faqs; moreheadstate.edu — Academic Misconduct → https://web.archive.org/web/20261009123832/https://www.moreheadstate.edu/student-life/student-affairs/dean-of-students/student-handbook/regulations-policies-guidelines/academic-misconduct.
Spot an error or an outdated quotation? hello@gatheredwork.com — corrections are made on the record, in this log.