Northern Kentucky University.
- Detection status
- No AI-text detector is named on NKU's own policy, teaching-center, or helpdesk pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; Turnitin is confirmed only for originality/plagiarism checking, and the AI Usage Guidelines govern syllabus policy without naming a detection tool
- Office in these sources
- Office of Student Conduct (Community Standards and Care) · University Center 330, Highland Heights, KY 41099 · 859-572-6475 · studentconduct@nku.edu
- Ombuds or advocacy office
- Student Advocacy, within the Dean of Students — self-described for students "experiencing a hardship (such as a family emergency, personal illness or other difficult situation)"; not described as independent, neutral, or confidential, and names no academic-integrity role. Contact runs through Community Standards and Care, (859) 572-5147, standardsandcare@nku.edu · nku.edu — Student Advocacy
- Sources last checked
- Sep 30, 2026
Reproduced from the institution's own pages quoted below — potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case.
NKU's published sources on AI detection and academic integrity, quoted and linked below. These are potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case — course syllabi, department handbooks, and the academic catalog may also apply, and NKU's own Student Rights page states that "[s]tudent rights in academic courses are largely created by the syllabi for individual courses." Confirm applicability with the institution. Any dates are quoted from the sources, not a deadline calculation performed for you.
No AI-text detector is named; Turnitin confirmed for originality checking only
NKU's Center for Excellence in Teaching and Innovation describes Turnitin (no on-page date; retrieved Sep 30, 2026):
No AI-writing-detection feature is named on this page. Source: Turnitin for Faculty — Center for Excellence in Teaching and Innovation.
NKU's AI Usage Guidelines (no on-page date; retrieved Sep 30, 2026) direct each course syllabus to state its own AI policy and offer instructors three sample syllabus statements — "Open Use," "Some Use," and "No Use" — rather than naming a University-wide detection tool. On enforcement, the same page states: "Failure to adhere to these expectations constitutes a possible violation of NKU's academic integrity standards and may result in disciplinary action." No detector is named anywhere on this page. Source: AI Usage Guidelines — Center for Excellence in Teaching and Innovation.
A named-vendor sweep of nku.edu (Turnitin AI writing indicator, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) and a category sweep (the Academic Honesty Policy, the Community Standards & Student Rights Code, the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Innovation's technology and AI-resource pages, and the Dean of Students' Academic Integrity pages) found no detector beyond Turnitin's originality checker.
What NKU's own pages say about how cases proceed
- Who may be present
- An Advisor is defined, without an Academic Dishonesty carve-out, as "a Student-identified individual that acts a support person at any NKU student conduct process meeting or hearing," who "may only consult and interact privately with their Student" and "will not be allowed to address University Officials" or others present. A companion FAQ page adds that "[t]he Respondent may have one (1) person with them during the hearing process to serve as a process advisor," who "may not represent or speak for the student." Recording is addressed for formal hearings generally — a hearing body will "create and retain a written summary or audio recording of the hearing (at University expense)" — though the Honor Code's own escalating-appeal steps (department chair, dean, Academic Appeals Panel) are not separately restated as recorded. Sources: Community Standards & Student Rights (the Code) and Attorney or Non-Attorney Advisor Resources (Code most recently amended Jan 13, 2023; retrieved Sep 30, 2026).
- What follows on the record
- No transcript notation is named. Retention is stated generally: "Student Conduct files are retained in the office of Community Standards and Care for seven (7) years after the Student graduates or is no longer enrolled," except that "[s]tudent conduct decisions resulting in sanctions of University Suspension/Expulsion will be retained permanently." A student may request destruction of non-Clery, non-suspension/expulsion records "after a Student's degree is conferred." No disclosure provision (to a graduate program, employer, or licensing board) is stated. Source: the Code, Records and Retention (retrieved Sep 30, 2026).
The two questions an adviser raises first, answered from this institution's own published documents — or recorded as not stated in them.
NKU's Community Standards & Student Rights Code embeds an "Undergraduate Student Honor Code" as one of its own sections (most recently amended Jan 13, 2023; retrieved Sep 30, 2026), which states the standard used to decide any charge under the Code:
Source: Community Standards & Student Rights (the Code), Sections E (Undergraduate Student Honor Code) and general provisions on standard of proof. A separate, shorter summary of the same sanctions appears on NKU's Academic Honesty Policy page. The Code's own text still names the office "Office of Student Conduct, Rights and Advocacy" throughout; the office's current public-facing pages present it as "Office of Student Conduct," which is the name used in this docket. What these quotations mean for any particular case is for the institution and its process to determine.
Where the documents live
| Document | Location |
|---|---|
| Academic Honesty Policy | nku.edu — Academic Honesty Policy |
| AI Usage Guidelines | nku.edu — AI Usage Guidelines |
| Turnitin for Faculty | nku.edu — Turnitin for Faculty |
| Community Standards & Student Rights (the Code, quoted for process, standard of proof, advisor, recording, and records) | nku.edu — Community Standards & Student Rights |
| Office of Student Conduct | nku.edu — Office of Student Conduct |
| Attorney or Non-Attorney Advisor Resources (FAQ) | nku.edu — Advisor Resources |
| Student Rights (Academic Integrity) | nku.edu — Student Rights, Academic Integrity |
| Student Advocacy (advocacy office; checked, docket row) | nku.edu — Student Advocacy |
Organizing your own drafts and records to bring to any of this: the records checklist. Capturing the pages above as they read today, and keeping your own dated record beside them: what to do with these sources.
Revision history of this page
2026-09-30 — Page created. Cold build; no prior CANDIDATES.md or procedure-facts.json research to reuse. Named-vendor sweep (Turnitin AI writing indicator, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) and category sweep (Academic Honesty Policy, AI Usage Guidelines, Turnitin for Faculty, the Community Standards & Student Rights Code, and the Dean of Students' Academic Integrity and Student Rights pages) found only Turnitin, confirmed for originality/plagiarism checking. NOT DISQUALIFIED: empty inventory, not a disabling or a recommendation against use. All inside.nku.edu URLs found by search redirected (HTTP 301) to their current www.nku.edu addresses; fetched and quoted at the resolved address in each case. PROCESS SOURCE PREFERRED: the "Academic Honesty Policy" summary page and the full Code's own "Undergraduate Student Honor Code" section say the same thing in the same words for the violations list and first/multiple-violation sanctions, but only the Code carries the escalating appeal chain (chair, dean, Academic Appeals Panel, Provost, Board of Regents) and the general standard-of-proof, advisor, recording, and records-retention provisions, so the Code is the page's primary citation and the summary page is linked as a secondary, shorter restatement. SCOPE CHECKED, UNLIKE A PRIOR PASSHE BUILD THIS SESSION: NKU's Honor Code is Section E of the same Community Standards & Student Rights Code (not a separate policy the Code routes away to), and the Code's own Advisor definition applies by its own terms to "any NKU student conduct process meeting or hearing" with no Academic-Dishonesty carve-out, so the general Advisor and Preponderance-standard provisions are used here as applicable to the Honor Code process, unlike the scope divergence recorded on Commonwealth University's page the same day. Recording is presented more cautiously: the general hearing-recording provision is not separately restated inside the Honor Code section's own escalating-appeal text, so it is described as applicable to formal hearings generally rather than confirmed for each appeal step by name. OMBUDS/ADVOCACY CHECKED: no office titled "ombudsperson" was located; NKU does have a department literally named "Student Advocacy" (within the Dean of Students), but its own page scopes it to hardship support (family emergency, illness) and names no academic-integrity role and no confidentiality or independence claim, so it is presented plainly rather than characterized as an ombuds. NAME DIVERGENCE noted, not resolved: the Code's own text names the responsible office "Office of Student Conduct, Rights and Advocacy" throughout, while the office's current public-facing page presents it as "Office of Student Conduct" with its own separate contact block; the docket uses the current page's contact and name, and the Code's fuller name is recorded in section 02. None of the fetched HTML pages displays an on-page revision date; the Code carries its own amendment history ("Amended: 11/21/2012; 9/8/2021; 6/15/2022; 1/13/2023"), so it is dated by its most recent amendment rather than by retrieval alone. Nothing paraphrase-pending. Archive captures pending — not requested this pass (unattended scheduled run). Reviewer: Carrie Schluter (review confirmed 2026-09-30).
Spot an error or an outdated quotation? hello@gatheredwork.com — corrections are made on the record, in this log.