Gathered Work

Post University.

Detection status
No AI-writing detector, or any text-plagiarism-detection tool, is named anywhere in the Academic Integrity Policy or the Generative AI Use Policy; suspected violations are reviewed by University personnel rather than software, and the only confirmed exam-integrity technology is an unnamed, generic online proctoring service plus ProctorU, named specifically for the American Sentinel College of Nursing & Health Sciences
Office in these sources
No dedicated academic-integrity or student-conduct office is named; the Academic Integrity Policy directs process questions to the Center for Academic Success (CAS) · 203-596-4686 · CAS@post.edu. Violations are reviewed by "the appropriate University personnel, as the situation dictates."
Ombuds or advocacy office
None located on the institution's own pages in this review.
Sources last checked
Sep 8, 2026

Reproduced from the institution's own pages quoted below — potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case.

Post University is a private, online-heavy institution; excerpts below are kept brief and linked to the originals rather than reproduced at length. Post's online 2026–2027 University Catalog states it "is not intended as a contractual agreement" and that the University "reserves the right to make changes within the term of this catalog," so confirm current wording directly with the institution. A course syllabus or program-specific rule may also apply and is not covered here. Any dates below are quoted from the sources, not a deadline calculation performed for you.

01Detection status

No detection tool named; review is by University personnel

Post's 2026–2027 online catalog (Academic Policies and Procedures; retrieved Sep 8, 2026) sets out the Academic Integrity Policy and a companion Generative AI Use Policy in full. Neither names Turnitin, SafeAssign, Copyleaks, GPTZero, or any other detection product. The Academic Integrity Policy instead treats material "obtained by Generative Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT, DALL.E, Bard, etc.)" as a form of unattributed source material subject to the same plagiarism rule as any other, and states that a suspected violation "will be reviewed by the appropriate University personnel" — a human review process, not a described software check. The Generative AI Use Policy separately requires that any AI-assisted work "be acknowledged in accordance with APA Style standards, including proper citations and references," with penalties for unacknowledged use referred to the Academic Integrity Policy.

A named-vendor sweep of Post's own pages (Turnitin, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) found none of them deployed for text-writing detection. A category sweep of the catalog's full Academic Policies and Procedures section, the Writing Center, and IT/library pages found no additional detection tool and no statement recommending against or disabling one — the inventory is silent, not adverse, which is why this is not treated as a step-2 disqualification.

The catalog does confirm exam-integrity technology, distinct from text detection: for most programs, "Proctored exam links are located within the course and use an online proctoring service that allows students to take exams from any location," requiring a webcam and government-issued photo ID, described only generically. For the American Sentinel College of Nursing & Health Sciences specifically, the catalog names ProctorU: students "create a ProctorU account within Moodle," and "professors will receive a notification of any red flags when the exam is over" — behavioral exam proctoring, not a text-writing detector, and scoped to that college's own programs.

Sources: 2026–2027 University Catalog — Academic Policies and Procedures (Academic Integrity, Generative AI Use Policy, Proctored Examinations).

02Published process

What the catalog says about how a case proceeds

Who may be present
Not stated in the sources reviewed. The Academic Integrity Policy states only that "the appropriate University personnel may request additional information from the student and/or other individuals involved in the Suspected Violation"; it names no support person, adviser, or observer, and does not address whether any review meeting or call may be recorded — searched in the full Academic Integrity Policy and Generative AI Use Policy text.
What follows on the record
Post states that a decision "will be communicated to the student and documented in the Academic Integrity Database." An Infraction 2 carries "the grade of an F in the course," with the student "removed by the Registrar from the course"; an Infraction 3 results in academic dismissal with no eligibility to reapply. Not stated in the sources reviewed: how long a record in the Academic Integrity Database is retained, whether an infraction is separately notated on the transcript beyond its grade effect, or whether it is disclosed to a graduate program, employer, or licensing board.

The two questions an adviser raises first, answered from this institution's own published documents — or recorded as not stated in them.

Post's Academic Integrity Policy groups infractions into five categories — cheating, plagiarizing, masking, falsifying information, and unauthorized use of course materials — and treats "Generative Artificial Intelligence" work presented as one's own as a form of plagiarism. A Suspected Violation is reviewed by "the appropriate University personnel, as the situation dictates," with the University retaining "the right to review work by the student from previous assignments, exams and/or courses." No evidentiary standard — such as "preponderance" — is named anywhere in the policy.

Confirmed sanctions escalate through named tiers: an Integrity Warning ("a zero on the assignment with the opportunity to resubmit"), Infraction 1 ("a zero on the assignment or assessment with no opportunity to resubmit"), Infraction 2 (course "F" and removal from the course by the Registrar), and Infraction 3 ("academically dismissed from Post University," ineligible for financial reimbursement or readmission). The policy states infractions are "typically" assigned consecutively but reserves the right to assign "a different infraction or a different penalty," including an immediate Infraction 3 "regardless of whether the student has previously received an Infraction 1 and/or an Infraction 2."

Two distinct appeal paths are published for two distinct outcomes. An Integrity Warning, Infraction 1, or Infraction 2 is appealed through the general Grade Appeal Process: student to instructor, then "the Program Chair or Dean (whoever oversees the instructor)," with a Dean's decision at that step being final; each step is to be completed "within seven (7) business days." An Infraction 3 (academic dismissal) instead follows the University's four-step Student Complaints process: an informal conversation, then the relevant Director or Dean, then a written decision from the Assistant Provost (academic matters) or Senior Vice President within five business days, and finally an independent review by the Chief Regulatory Officer and General Counsel, "the final internal step," within seven business days.

Sources: 2026–2027 University Catalog — Academic Policies and Procedures · Student Complaints. What any of this means for a particular case is for the institution and its process to determine.

03Source map

Where the documents live

DocumentLocation
Academic Integrity Policy, Generative AI Use Policy, Proctored Examinations (2026–2027 University Catalog)catalog.post.edu — Academic Policies and Procedures (retrieved Sep 8, 2026)
Catalog disclaimer (non-contractual; subject to change)catalog.post.edu — Catalog Home (retrieved Sep 8, 2026)
Dismissal appeal (Infraction 3) — Student Complaints, four-step processpost.edu — Student Complaints (retrieved Sep 8, 2026)
Center for Academic Success (CAS) — contact, named in the Academic Integrity Policy for policy questionspost.edu — Center for Academic Success (retrieved Sep 8, 2026)
General Code of Conduct (non-academic; distinct from Academic Integrity Policy)post.edu — Code of Conduct Policy (retrieved Sep 8, 2026)

Organizing your own drafts and records to bring to any of this: the records checklist. Capturing the pages above as they read today, and keeping your own dated record beside them: what to do with these sources.

04Change log

Revision history of this page

2026-09-08 — Page created. First-party material captured this date from Post's dynamic online catalog (catalog.post.edu, 2026–2027 University Catalog), Academic Policies and Procedures section, read live in a browser because the catalog renders client-side and paginates by anchor within a single content page and returns HTTP 202 with an empty body to a plain fetch; the Academic Integrity Policy, Generative AI Use Policy, Grade Appeal Process, and Proctored Examinations sections were all captured from that one page and preserved at tools/supplied/post-source1.txt, and the catalog home page's non-contractual disclaimer was preserved the same way at tools/supplied/post-source5.txt (recipe sources 1 and 5; both require a browser read, not an automatable transport, so a later capture pass must resupply them). The Student Complaints page and Center for Academic Success contact page were also read live. Named-vendor sweep (Turnitin, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) found none deployed for text detection; ProctorU is confirmed but named only for the American Sentinel College of Nursing & Health Sciences and is behavioral exam proctoring, not text-writing detection. Category sweep of the full Academic Policies and Procedures section, Writing Center, and library/IT pages found no additional tool and no statement recommending against or disabling one. Not disqualified: the inventory is silent, not adverse — unlike Illinois State, Grand Valley, or Rowan, no Post page states in its own voice that a detector is absent by policy or unreliable; it simply never comes up. Deliberate omission: the general (non-academic) Code of Conduct Policy was read and found to add no academic-integrity-specific detail, so it is listed in the source map but not quoted from. Ombuds/advocacy sweep (ombuds, ombudsperson, student advocacy, dean of students advocacy) found none. Office contact: no dedicated conduct or integrity office is named anywhere in the policy; the Center for Academic Success is the contact the Academic Integrity Policy itself directs students to for policy questions, recorded as such rather than presented as the office that adjudicates violations. Nothing paraphrase-pending. Internet Archive captures: to be added. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter (review confirmed 2026-09-08).

2026-09-13 — Editorial review. Carrie Schluter read this page in full against its recorded first-party sources and found no change required. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter (review confirmed 2026-09-13).

2026-09-14 — Internet Archive capture pass; captures requested and confirmed by tools/spn.py, not a human review and not a re-verification of any quotation. Stored and played back this date: the catalog home page (catalog.post.edu), the student-complaints page, and the Center for Academic Success contact page. The catalog's Academic Policies and Procedures section (catalog.post.edu/content.php?catoid=93&navoid=5596) was not stored: it returns HTTP 202 with an empty body to an automated request, the same behaviour the 2026-09-08 build recorded when it had to read that section live in a browser. It rests seven days before it is eligible again, and it is the source most likely to need a hand-supplied capture rather than a Save Page Now request.

2026-09-17 — Internet Archive captures requested this date by an automated capture pass; no human review is claimed for this entry. No quotation, date, finding or link above was changed by it. Each capture below was requested through Save Page Now and then confirmed to play back. Captures added: Content — catalog.post.edu → https://web.archive.org/web/20260917151624/https://catalog.post.edu/content.php?catoid=93&navoid=5596; Student Complaints | Post University → https://web.archive.org/web/20260917151742/https://post.edu/about/student-satisfaction-and-performance/student-complaints/; Center for Academic Success | Post University → https://web.archive.org/web/20260917151831/https://post.edu/student-services/center-for-academic-success/; Post University Resources - Code of Conduct Policy → https://web.archive.org/web/20260917151950/https://post.edu/student-services/student-affairs/code-of-conduct/; Post University — Catalog Home (2026-2027 University Catalog) → https://web.archive.org/web/20260917152112/https://catalog.post.edu/.

2026-10-06 — Internet Archive captures requested on 2026-09-14 by an automated capture pass and recorded this date; no human review is claimed for this entry. No quotation, date, finding or link above was changed by it. Each capture below was requested through Save Page Now and then confirmed to play back. Captures added: 2026–2027 University Catalog → https://web.archive.org/web/20260914165645/https://catalog.post.edu.

Spot an error or an outdated quotation? hello@gatheredwork.com — corrections are made on the record, in this log.