University of North Dakota.

Detection status: No AI-text detector, or any specific plagiarism-detection tool, is named as deployed on UND's own academic-integrity, student-life, or library pages across a named-vendor and category sweep; the Provost's own AI page instead cautions that "websites that purport to detect the use of AI are flawed and have high occurrences of false positives and negatives"
Office in these sources: Community Standards & Care Network · Memorial Union Room 240, 2901 University Ave Stop 9040, Grand Forks, ND 58202-9040 · 701-777-2664 · UND.communitystandards@UND.edu
Ombuds or advocacy office: None located on the institution's own pages in this review.
Sources last checked: Sep 28, 2026

Reproduced from the institution’s own pages quoted below — potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case.

University of North Dakota's published sources on AI detection and academic integrity, quoted and linked below. These are potentially relevant official sources, not a determination of which one governs any case — UND's own guidance states that "if a student is uncertain about what is expected, they should clarify expectations with their instructor," so course syllabi may set additional or different rules. Confirm applicability with the institution. Any dates are quoted from the sources, not a deadline calculation performed for you.

01Detection status

UND's own pages caution against AI-detection tools rather than naming a deployed one

Named-vendor sweep (Turnitin, Turnitin AI writing indicator, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) and category sweep (the Provost's AI page, the TTaDA teaching-technology resources, the University Libraries' AI research guide, and the Code of Student Life) found no first-party statement that any AI-text detector — or any plagiarism-checking tool at all — is deployed institution-wide. The Provost's own Artificial Intelligence page states (retrieved Sep 28, 2026):

"Note that websites that purport to detect the use of AI are flawed and have high occurrences of false positives and negatives." "Use caution and be transparent with your students if you do decide to use these tools."

Source: Artificial Intelligence (AI) — Office of the Provost. The page links three external articles on AI-detection tool problems and directs instructors with concerns to file an Academic Integrity Concern Report, rather than naming any institutional detector of its own. The University Libraries' AI Resources guide (retrieved Sep 28, 2026) lists AI research tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and similar) and citation guidance; it names no plagiarism or AI-writing detection product. Source: AI: Artificial Intelligence Resources — University Libraries. Nothing in UND's Code of Student Life names Turnitin or any other detector either; its Acts of Dishonesty section defines academic dishonesty in conduct terms only (see below).

02Published procedure

What UND's own pages say about how cases proceed

Who may be present: A student has the right to "choose to be accompanied by a personal advocate" in the student conduct process, though "personal advocates are not permitted to participate directly in the hearing" — the advocate "may offer support, guidance, and advice to the student in a manner that does not disrupt the proceedings." A hearing is recorded: the student's disciplinary record includes "If applicable, the audio recording of the hearing, which is the sole official verbatim record of the hearing and is the property of the University of North Dakota."
What follows on the record: No transcript notation specific to an academic-integrity or conduct finding is named; the Code states only that an official transcript may include "A statement of probation/dismissal" among ordinary academic items (grades, credits, degrees). On retention: disciplinary records are "kept according to the general records retention schedule," which the Code states is "currently six years following the current academic year." On disclosure: a disciplinary record "is confidential and may not be disclosed in whole or in part except as allowed in the Educational Records section of the Code, upon written request of the student, or in response to a court order."

The two questions an adviser raises first, answered from this institution’s own published documents — or recorded as not stated in them.

From UND's Code of Student Life (Last Approved, Effective, and Last Revised 08/2026; retrieved Sep 28, 2026), on academic dishonesty and how it may be addressed:

"Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, and collusion. Students are expected to follow all direction provided by the instructor as it relates to academic work. At the discretion of the instructor, cases of academic dishonesty may be referred to student conduct as a disciplinary matter in addition to being responded to by an academic unit." "Instructors may address incidents of dishonesty for that instructor's course, including (but not limited to) assigning a grade based on the instructor's determination that the student engaged in academic dishonesty related to that course. If the student has a grievance related to this action, that grievance would be directed to the college or school in which the course is housed." "The student conduct process is educational in nature and determination of responsibility for all alleged violations of the Code is based on the preponderance of information standard. […] The preponderance of information standard is defined as more likely than not. An anonymous complaint cannot provide satisfactory information to determine that a student has violated the Code."

Where a case is referred to the student conduct process rather than resolved by the instructor alone, the Code's Appeal Process applies:

"After being found in violation of the Code, the accused student has the right to appeal the outcome of the administrative student conduct process." "Appeals must be made in writing to the dean of students within five business days after the notification of any administrative student conduct process decision." "Grounds for appeal may be based on such things as: New information, Contradictory information, and/or Information that indicates the student in violation was not afforded due process."

Source: Code of Student Life, via the policy portal linked from UND's own Code of Student Life page. What any of this means for a particular case is for the institution and its process to determine.

03Source map

Where the documents live

Document	Location
Code of Student Life	und.policystat.com — Code of Student Life (Last Approved, Effective, and Last Revised 08/2026; retrieved Sep 28, 2026), linked from und.edu/student-life/code-of-student-life.html
Artificial Intelligence (AI) — Office of the Provost	und.edu/academics/provost/about/ai.html (retrieved Sep 28, 2026)
AI: Artificial Intelligence Resources — University Libraries	libguides.und.edu/ai-resources/UND_Resources (retrieved Sep 28, 2026)
Community Standards & Care Network (office contact)	und.edu/student-life/cscn/index.html · Memorial Union Room 240 · 701-777-2664 · UND.communitystandards@UND.edu (retrieved Sep 28, 2026)
Division of Student Affairs	und.edu/student-life/student-affairs (retrieved Sep 28, 2026)

Organizing your own drafts and records to bring to any of this: the records checklist. Capturing the pages above as they read today, and keeping your own dated record beside them: what to do with these sources.

04Change log

Revision history of this page

2026-09-28 — Page created by a scheduled, unattended build pass. All quotations retrieved this date from und.edu pages linked beside them and from the Code of Student Life served through UND's PolicyStat policy portal (Last Approved/Effective/Last Revised 08/2026). Detection-inventory sweep performed: named-vendor sweep (Turnitin, Turnitin AI writing indicator, SimCheck, Originality, Copyleaks, iThenticate, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Winston AI, Crossplag, ZeroGPT, Packback, Grammarly Authorship, Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus, Examity) and category sweep (Provost AI page, TTaDA teaching-technology resources, University Libraries AI research guide, and the Code of Student Life) came back empty of any first-party statement that an AI-text detector, or any plagiarism-checking tool at all, is deployed institution-wide -- no Turnitin, SafeAssign, or similar product was confirmed anywhere, which distinguishes this page from the more common pattern of a confirmed similarity checker with an unconfirmed AI feature. NOT DISQUALIFIED: the Provost's page cautions instructors who might independently choose to use an AI-detection website ("[u]se caution and be transparent with your students if you do decide to use these tools") rather than stating that a University-run detector has been disabled or is recommended against outright; this is an empty inventory with an advisory caution attached, not a documented deactivation. PROCESS SOURCE: the Code of Student Life's Acts of Dishonesty section (course-level, instructor-administered by default, referable to student conduct at the instructor's discretion) read together with the general Student Conduct Process sections (Student Rights, Standard of Determination, Administrative Student Conduct Process, Appeal Process) for the rights, standard, and appeal path that govern a referred case. SUBSTANTIVE FINDING: no transcript notation specific to an academic-integrity or conduct violation is named; the Code states only that an official transcript may carry a general "statement of probation/dismissal." Disciplinary-record retention is stated precisely: "six years following the current academic year," office of record Community Standards & Care Network. OMBUDS/ADVOCACY CHECKED, NONE FOUND: no current und.edu page names an active ombudsperson or ombuds office; a 2014 news item about UND's first-ever Ombudsperson was traced to a third-party blog describing organizational conflict and is not a current first-party source, so it is not used. The Division of Student Affairs' own landing page describes a general mission to "advocate for students" without naming a specific office, describing its scope, or claiming confidentiality or independence; not substituted for an ombuds. Docket states none located. Nothing paraphrase-pending. Subreddit demand scan not run (outside this run's research method). Internet Archive captures: to be added. Reviewer: Carrie Schluter (review confirmed 2026-09-28).

2026-10-06 — Internet Archive captures requested on 2026-09-29 by an automated capture pass and recorded this date; no human review is claimed for this entry. No quotation, date, finding or link above was changed by it. Each capture below was requested through Save Page Now and then confirmed to play back. Captures added: Artificial Intelligence (AI) — Office of the Provost → https://web.archive.org/web/20260929114113/https://und.edu/academics/provost/about/ai.html; und.edu/student-life/code-of-student-life.html → https://web.archive.org/web/20260929114145/https://und.edu/student-life/code-of-student-life.html; und.edu/student-life/cscn/index.html → https://web.archive.org/web/20260929114218/https://und.edu/student-life/cscn/index.html; und.edu/student-life/student-affairs → https://web.archive.org/web/20260929114252/https://und.edu/student-life/student-affairs/index.html.

Spot an error or an outdated quotation? hello@gatheredwork.com — corrections are made on the record, in this log.